|
|
Post by ๐๐ฟMรถrรถn๐๐ฟ on Jun 12, 2018 0:16:00 GMT -5
 I visited there when I was kid (most likely in July or August) and all I remember is the extremely dry air. Everything is perfect except for the low precipitation and average lows throughout the year. A solid B from me as they cop some excellent snowstorms and receive a healthy amount of sunshine and summer thunderstorms (although with pitiful rainfall).  |
|
|
|
Post by Beercules on Jun 12, 2018 0:19:33 GMT -5
E-
those lows lmao, those diurnal ranges, there's no excuse. And the rediculous snowfall. The only redeeming feature is the 2 months of insipid crummer highs.
Disaster
|
|
|
|
Post by knot on Jun 12, 2018 0:22:45 GMT -5
Bโ for the squally nature (due to high elevation), and how unstable it is. Not really a cold fucken desert like Umeรฅ or Snorrekรถping due to high winds and actual weather during summer. UV index looks to be fucken epic, too  |
|
|
|
Post by alex992 on Jun 12, 2018 0:47:45 GMT -5
Wow, this is some climate. The high diurnal ranges look fun, and winters look like they can get quite severe blizzards and cold, but this climate really isn't my cup of tea. 1 C summer lows are insane, and also conversely those winter highs are way too mild (if they were 10 C lower and summer lows 10 C higher this would get a much higher grade).
I give it a D for being interesting, but Jesus Christ lol
|
|
|
|
Post by Babu on Jun 12, 2018 11:12:59 GMT -5
Bโ for the squally nature (due to high elevation), and how unstable it is. Not really a cold fucken desert like Umeรฅ or Snorrekรถping due to high winds and actual weather during summer. UV index looks to be fucken epic, too Why do you care about high UV indices? Do you really care about tanning? |
|
|
|
Post by Steelernation on Jun 12, 2018 12:12:53 GMT -5
C. Highs are too cool in spring and especially summer, record highs are fucking lame but the precipitation and diurnals are epic.
|
|
|
|
Post by knot on Jun 12, 2018 16:32:59 GMT -5
Why do you care about high UV indices? Do you really care about tanning? Because deep blue skies & extremely potent sun rays are fucken epic, much unlike the light-bulb sunlight of Europe   Extreme is always the way to go, fucken. |
|
|
|
Post by Morningrise on Jun 12, 2018 16:47:38 GMT -5
I think I'll give this one a D+
The diurnal range is way too high year round, winters are too snowy, summers are too dry, and I really don't like high UV indices, but on the plus side those daytime highs are perfectly pleasant year round.
|
|
|
|
Post by Giorbanguly on Jun 12, 2018 19:28:32 GMT -5
E, horrible climate
|
|
|
|
Post by ilmc90 on Jun 12, 2018 20:43:13 GMT -5
B Probably too sunny considering the dryness and diurnal ranges, but it does look like a fun climate. The summer afternoons look pleasantly warm while the nights provide for comfortable sleeping conditions. Winters are solid between the diurnal ranges and potential for snowfall. I like that I could get my bitter cold fix and more tolerable daytime temperatures within a day. |
|
|
|
Post by Babu on Jun 12, 2018 23:56:16 GMT -5
Why do you care about high UV indices? Do youย really care about tanning? Because deep blue skies & extremely potent sun rays are fucken epic, much unlike the light-bulb sunlight of Europe Extreme is always the way to go, fucken. Elevation affects sky color. Ozone doesn't. Also didn't really notice any difference in the sky color in Thailand except when it was hazy. |
|
|
|
Post by knot on Jun 13, 2018 1:04:53 GMT -5
Elevation affects sky color. Ozone doesn't. Also didn't really notice any difference in the sky color in Thailand except when it was hazy. Thanks for proving my point, dickhead. That's exactly what I was saying; Europe has light-bulb sunlight because most of its actual settlements/townships are not elevated. |
|
|
|
Post by Babu on Jun 13, 2018 1:42:27 GMT -5
Elevation affects sky color. Ozone doesn't. Also didn't really notice any difference in the sky color in Thailand except when it was hazy. Thanks for proving my point, dickhead. That's exactly what I was saying; Europe has light-bulb sunlight because most of its actual settlements/townships are not elevated. Which is why it's very strange and misleading of you to talk about the UV radiation when you're actually talking about altitude. I was amazed by how blue the sky on Kebnekaise (our tallest mountain) was, but the UV wasn't that high because the noon solar angle was less than 40ยฐ. Although this is a common occurence with you. You always say one thing and mean another, not in a smart metaphorical way, but in a dumb ignorant way. Calling people gay when they're in touch with their feelings or aren't apathic sociopaths like you. |
|
|
|
Post by knot on Jun 13, 2018 1:56:02 GMT -5
Which is why it's very strange and misleading of you to talk about the UV radiation when you're actually talking about altitude (I). I was amazed by how blue the sky on Kebnekaise (our tallest mountain) was, but the UV wasn't that high because the noon solar angle was less than 40ยฐ. Although this is a common occurence with you. You always say one thing and mean another, not in a smart metaphorical way, but in a dumb ignorant way. Calling people gay when they're in touch with their feelings or aren't apathic sociopaths like you. (II). I). Actually, high altitude is pretty much on parity with high UV index; much more so than latitude. This climateโone of high altitudeโwas especially within referrence. II). Just how many fellas on here would call me a "sociopath" for using gay as an insult, ya fucken drongo? Just so you know, almost every member on this forum shits all over you behind your back and upfront to you, so I wouldn't be talking if I were stuck in your catastrophic position |
|
|
|
Post by Babu on Jun 13, 2018 3:28:52 GMT -5
Which is why it's very strange and misleading of you to talk about the UV radiation when you're actually talking about altitude (I). I was amazed by how blue the sky on Kebnekaise (our tallest mountain) was, but the UV wasn't that high because the noon solar angle was less than 40ยฐ. Although this is a common occurence with you. You always say one thing and mean another, not in a smart metaphorical way, but in a dumb ignorant way. Calling people gay when they're in touch with their feelings or aren't apathic sociopaths like you. (II). I). Actually, high altitude is pretty much on parity with high UV index; much more so than latitude. This climateโone of high altitudeโwas especially within referrence. II). Just how many fellas on here would call me a "sociopath" for using gay as an insult, ya fucken drongo? Just so you know, almost every member on this forum shits all over you behind your back and upfront to you, so I wouldn't be talking if I were stuck in your catastrophic position My reputation affects what people think of what I say, but it neither affects the meaning nor truth behind what I say. I would never call you a sociopath if all you did were calling people gay. |
|
|
|
Post by Palider on Jun 13, 2018 13:39:34 GMT -5
It's an E from me. Summers aren't warm enough and diurnal range is too high.
|
|
|
|
Post by boombo on Jun 14, 2018 4:14:22 GMT -5
It's certainly one of the more interesting climates out there but those lows in particular are just a joke, especially in summer. E.
|
|
|
|
Post by Ariete on Jun 14, 2018 10:55:35 GMT -5
E. At least it's livable.
|
|
|
|
Post by shalop on Jun 14, 2018 13:14:05 GMT -5
I'd say a B. The lows are totally fine year-round. But the high temps fuck up the climate, way too damn warm for the colder part of the year.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 14, 2018 13:17:34 GMT -5
Ugh. F.
|
|
Extreme is always the way to go, fucken.
