|
|
Post by Lommaren on Jun 27, 2018 11:56:32 GMT -5
Yep, it's actually called "100 Mile House"! It's located in Central British Columbia at 51°N. Sunshine is likely somewhere between 1,800 and 2,000 hours per year. Doncaster on the other hand is cloudier, milder and wetter. It is way less likely to see strong heat and severe cold, but even summer means are warmer due to the maritime nights in England. My vote is for Doncaster by a handsome (C vs D-) margin. Winters are above the dead zone in Doncaster, whereas summers are decent enough by British standards. The greater number of days above 25°C don't cancel out 100 Mile Houses' deficiencies.   |
|
|
|
Post by Cadeau on Jun 27, 2018 11:59:42 GMT -5
Of course Doncaster from my perspective.
|
|
|
|
Post by alex992 on Jun 27, 2018 12:03:07 GMT -5
100 mile house is superior in pretty much every way.
|
|
|
|
Post by knot on Jun 27, 2018 12:03:16 GMT -5
100 Mile House, fucken!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 27, 2018 12:10:06 GMT -5
Doncaster
|
|
|
|
Post by 🖕🏿Mörön🖕🏿 on Jun 27, 2018 12:14:15 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by nei on Jun 27, 2018 12:15:07 GMT -5
100 mile house is at 3000 feet; a climate at 3000 feet in Britain would be colder and much gloomier
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 27, 2018 12:48:02 GMT -5
Doncaster!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 27, 2018 13:03:41 GMT -5
Doncaster.
It's amazing how rapidly the climates in BC decline once you get above 50N.
|
|
|
|
Post by nei on Jun 27, 2018 13:22:19 GMT -5
Doncaster. It's amazing how rapidly the climates in BC decline once you get above 50N. thought it's at 3000 feet. but most of interior BC is on a plateau, below 50-51°N there are some locations in valleys at low elevation. A lot of the fast decline is from an elevation increase. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 27, 2018 13:55:23 GMT -5
Doncaster. It's amazing how rapidly the climates in BC decline once you get above 50N. thought it's at 3000 feet. but most of interior BC is on a plateau, below 50-51°N there are some locations in valleys at low elevation. A lot of the fast decline is from an elevation increase. True, but are there any climate boxes at lower elevations to give a sense of perspective? |
|
|
|
Post by rpvan on Jun 27, 2018 14:05:21 GMT -5
100 Mile House for sure. One of the many stops on the drive through the interior plateau from Cache Creek north to Prince George.
|
|
|
|
Post by 🖕🏿Mörön🖕🏿 on Jun 27, 2018 14:11:58 GMT -5
thought it's at 3000 feet. but most of interior BC is on a plateau, below 50-51°N there are some locations in valleys at low elevation. A lot of the fast decline is from an elevation increase. True, but are there any climate boxes at lower elevations to give a sense of perspective? Castlegar |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 27, 2018 14:13:27 GMT -5
True, but are there any climate boxes at lower elevations to give a sense of perspective? Castlegar 49N, bro. I know they're good. But how about 51/52N? |
|
|
|
Post by Steelernation on Jun 27, 2018 15:12:43 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by nei on Jun 27, 2018 16:15:21 GMT -5
thought it's at 3000 feet. but most of interior BC is on a plateau, below 50-51°N there are some locations in valleys at low elevation. A lot of the fast decline is from an elevation increase. True, but are there any climate boxes at lower elevations to give a sense of perspective? Whole area is a plateau, couldn't find any low elevation stations at that latitude. Williams Lake to the northwest is at 2000' but its airport is on a hill above at 3000'. Looking at both of them might give a hint on a low elevation station could be like there en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Williams_Lake,_British_Columbia#Climate Bella Coola is at 52°N and warmer but it's on the rainward, ocean facing side of the Coast Range en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bella_Coola,_British_Columbia#Climate area get impressive record highs relative to its averages, topography is a bit coastal Norway-like. Its sunshine numbers probably too low as tall mountains block the high sun. |
|
|
|
Post by rpvan on Jun 27, 2018 18:39:57 GMT -5
True, but are there any climate boxes at lower elevations to give a sense of perspective? Whole area is a plateau, couldn't find any low elevation stations at that latitude. Williams Lake to the northwest is at 2000' but its airport is on a hill above at 3000'. Looking at both of them might give a hint on a low elevation station could be like there en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Williams_Lake,_British_Columbia#Climate Bella Coola is at 52°N and warmer but it's on the rainward, ocean facing side of the Coast Range en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bella_Coola,_British_Columbia#Climate area get impressive record highs relative to its averages, topography is a bit coastal Norway-like. Its sunshine numbers probably too low as tall mountains block the high sun. Barriere. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barriere,_British_Columbia#Climate |
|
|
|
Post by Donar on Jul 1, 2018 13:38:45 GMT -5
100 Mile House. Not a great climate but the rainless winters save it.
|
|
|
|
Post by boombo on Jul 1, 2018 16:58:11 GMT -5
Doncaster. If the daily means were actually the lows and the lows were something like the absolute lows they'd get in an average month then I'd go with the other place, as it is I couldn't live somewhere that averages freezing nights even in late April and early October.
|
|
|
|
Post by jgtheone on Jul 1, 2018 22:21:14 GMT -5
Doncaster, other one's too cold
|
|
Lived:
Residence:
