|
|
Post by 🖕🏿Mörön🖕🏿 on Nov 4, 2018 0:52:41 GMT -5
  Sch(l)omberg is obviously better, with the warmer summers, colder winters, and more appreciable precipitation. |
|
|
|
Post by knot on Nov 4, 2018 2:59:54 GMT -5
Sch(l)omberg wins due to its far superior latitude of 44° N, and higher precipitation totals. Also, about that name...   |
|
|
|
Post by Lommaren on Nov 4, 2018 6:03:29 GMT -5
Schomberg is slightly better due the nicer summers, but it's very close due to the excessive winter cold there, C- vs C-.
|
|
|
|
Post by Lommaren on Nov 4, 2018 6:17:29 GMT -5
Anyway, here are the 1981-2010 updated and more complete normals for Schomberg that I just updated on Wikipedia  Also, 🖕🏿Mörön🖕🏿 , the precipitation amount in the OP weatherbox is wrong for the annual total and should be 773.9 mm instead, so the person who updated Wikipedia all those years ago probably looked at the rainfall total rather than the precipitation total...
|
|
|
|
Post by Ariete on Nov 4, 2018 10:30:51 GMT -5
Schomberg fucken
|
|
|
|
Post by Steelernation on Nov 4, 2018 11:13:27 GMT -5
Schomburg easily
|
|
|
|
Post by Babu on Nov 4, 2018 11:43:51 GMT -5
Schlomberg. Nicer and longer summers, and stronger sun in the winter half-year kinda negates a bit of the cooler weather. Also more heat potential in winter.
|
|
|
|
Post by alex992 on Nov 4, 2018 15:58:32 GMT -5
Schlomberg easily.
|
|
|
|
Post by Crunch41 on Nov 4, 2018 20:49:35 GMT -5
Schlongberg is much better, A climate. Snorrkoping is a B+ for being milder in winter and summer.
|
|
Also, 
