|
Post by ππΏMΓΆrΓΆnππΏ on Jan 2, 2019 2:09:12 GMT -5
Well, I gotta say this is one of the best climates in the southwest, besides Cloudcroft, NM. A- for me.
|
|
|
Post by Moron on Jan 2, 2019 2:13:31 GMT -5
Too cold all yea rround, summers look pretty interesting though. Probably heaps of good skiing regions around the town. E, at least it's pretty liveable at daytime from may to september.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 2, 2019 9:04:58 GMT -5
A
|
|
|
Post by Steelernation on Jan 2, 2019 14:22:59 GMT -5
Well, I gotta say this is one of the best climates in the Southwest Not with that crummer lol. Winter and fall are good but too stable, spring is too cool and stable, summer is too cool, wet and stable. Iβll give it a D.
|
|
|
Post by Speagles84 on Jan 2, 2019 18:12:52 GMT -5
B. Like the snow and summer temps, but the lack of winter cold concerns me about the reliability of snowpack
|
|
|
Post by sari on Jan 2, 2019 18:18:19 GMT -5
I agree with your A-! Beautiful climate.
|
|
|
Post by jgtheone on Jan 2, 2019 18:23:52 GMT -5
E.
|
|
|
Post by Crunch41 on Jan 2, 2019 23:09:18 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Beercules on Jan 3, 2019 0:15:29 GMT -5
E- Shit. Had those crummers been 2C colder it would've been an automatic F
|
|
|
Post by firebird1988 on Jan 7, 2019 0:49:30 GMT -5
F
Too cold and snowy and mornings too cold year round
|
|
|
Post by sari on Jan 7, 2019 1:53:55 GMT -5
Seems like the mean is not the mode. It looks like some months have absolutely massive snow totals while some are tiny. As an example: December 2002 = 30.4 inches, January 2003 = 1.6 inches, February 2003 = 46.9 inches. Edit: Nowdata also has a day in April 1917 that supposedly had a maximum of 92F and a minimum of 0F. Considering that May's record high is 89F and there was snow recorded the following day, I'm pretty sure it's supposed to be 29F instead.
|
|
|
Post by shalop on Jan 7, 2019 2:41:05 GMT -5
^I doubt that any place ever (on earth) has recorded a max of 92 and a min of 0. Closest I can think of is OKC which posted a day with 83/17 (iirc) a couple decades ago.
|
|
|
Post by sari on Jan 7, 2019 2:59:16 GMT -5
^I doubt that any place ever (on earth) has recorded a max of 92 and a min of 0. Closest I can think of is OKC which posted a day with 83/17 (iirc) a couple decades ago. Apparently the largest diurnal range ever was 102F in 1916 somewhere in Montana. It's possible, but very unlikely. Probably a recording error.
|
|
|
Post by shalop on Jan 7, 2019 23:07:04 GMT -5
^No I definitely believe that 100 F daily range in Montana. Those kinds of events have been documented when a powerful temperature inversion has caused the temps to plummet to -40F or so, then a Chinook passes by and suddenly it rises to +50 F.
But to go from 90 to 0 you need something totally different, namely a really strong cold front like in that OKC event. But (as far as I know), even the strongest cold front followed by an equally strong inversion can't make the temp drop from 90 to 0. Too big of a gap.
|
|
|
Post by alex992 on Jan 12, 2019 22:02:22 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Crunch41 on Jan 13, 2019 0:38:35 GMT -5
Here is the monthly data for those two places in Montana. I would love to see hourly data if someone knows where to find that. Or a news article if it made the news. Browning's 100F drop shows up as two days on the daily data. 44F on the 23rd, -56 on the 24th. 0.5 inches of snow was observed that day, too. And 4 inches on the 26th that was -22/-52. Overall an extremely cold month that was more snowy than average. Normal for Browning is 28/8 in January. Great Falls was 28F below normal this month, close to the legendary February 1936 that was 32 below normal.
Loma saw a 103F rise in 1972. They went from -54 to +51 to -15 within 5 days. A very snowy and cold month for Loma, too.
|
|
|
Post by sari on Jan 13, 2019 1:56:01 GMT -5
^No I definitely believe that 100 F daily range in Montana. Those kinds of events have been documented when a powerful temperature inversion has caused the temps to plummet to -40F or so, then a Chinook passes by and suddenly it rises to +50 F. But to go from 90 to 0 you need something totally different, namely a really strong cold front like in that OKC event. But (as far as I know), even the strongest cold front followed by an equally strong inversion can't make the temp drop from 90 to 0. Too big of a gap. When I said "It's possible, but very unlikely. Probably a recording error. " I was referring to the 92/0 in AZ. My fault for making it easily misinterpretable.
|
|
|
Post by Morningrise on Jan 13, 2019 20:38:54 GMT -5
C. Good seasonal variety but winters are way too snowy and diurnal range is way too high for my liking.
|
|
|
Post by tij on Jan 23, 2019 19:40:49 GMT -5
C+, borderline B-... nights are too chilly, but days are decent... also too dry....
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 23, 2019 21:44:55 GMT -5
D. By average annual temperature it's colder than MontrΓ©al. Lows are horrible with probably only about 3 continuous frost-free months per year on average.
|
|