|
Post by Babu on Jan 14, 2019 17:20:37 GMT -5
Tafjord's data is from 1930, and Lund's data is from 1990. Tafjord's highs and lows are cherrypicked seperately. For example February 1990 had the warmest highs, but 2014 had warmer lows. Lund is only using full months, so just February 1990. Records are unfortunately from the whole data period and not for the used months, because eklima stopped working. Precipitation is taken from the used months, and in the cases when two months have been used for Tafjord, I chose the month with most ideal precipitation. All monthly temperature data are the highest, except for April in Lund where I chose 2009 over 2011 despite a 0.1'C lesser mean because the highs were 1'C warmer. For me it's a close one. Tafjord has more ideal precipitation, and temps from October to February. Lund is much better in March-June as well as September. July and August are pretty much equal to me. I really like the warm off-season record highs in Tafjord though, but in the end I think Lund barely nudges ahead.
|
|
|
Post by Steelernation on Jan 14, 2019 17:21:50 GMT -5
Lund is an easy choice for being more continental.
|
|
|
Post by Morningrise on Jan 14, 2019 20:33:10 GMT -5
Although I prefer Lund's summer temperatures I think I'm gonna have to go with Tafjord for more precipitation in the summer and less in the fall/winter.
|
|
|
Post by ππΏMΓΆrΓΆnππΏ on Jan 14, 2019 22:31:48 GMT -5
Tafjord for wetter summers.
|
|
|
Post by Crunch41 on Jan 15, 2019 0:14:18 GMT -5
Tafjord for wetter summers and less drizzly winters. Tafjord is drier in winter which is good at those temperatures. Lund is too dry in summer, so even though the temperature is great I don't like it.
|
|
|
Post by jgtheone on Jan 15, 2019 6:24:10 GMT -5
Lund for me, quite easily.
|
|
|
Post by alex992 on Jan 15, 2019 9:38:12 GMT -5
Lund, but they're both garb.
|
|