|
|
Post by Ariete on Mar 13, 2019 18:19:59 GMT -5
Ariete Well the kids are morons.
How? It's they who have to deal with the future climate, not 70-year old members of parliament.
|
|
|
|
Post by 🖕🏿Mörön🖕🏿 on Mar 13, 2019 20:54:21 GMT -5
Ariete Well the kids are morons.
How? It's they who have to deal with the future climate, not 70-year old members of parliament.
Because after all this time of fear-mongering about "battling a warmer climate and rising sea-levels" and expecting the worst a warmer climate has to offer (which pales in comparison to what a colder climate would do), these stupid will most likely experience cooler conditions as time goes on. Maybe it won't have much of an effect, maybe it will. But if it does, then they will be very unprepared! Take a look at this graph. Yup, the climate is definitely changing...  |
|
|
|
Post by 🖕🏿Mörön🖕🏿 on Mar 13, 2019 21:05:01 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Hiromant on Mar 14, 2019 2:26:46 GMT -5
I also love the irony of these protesters whining "Politicians have done nothing for DECADES!" without asking themselves that if a catastrophe takes more than several decades to unfold, is it even worth mentioning. The world should have ended before these students were born if the predictions had been true. Soon it'll be hundreds of years of no action! We're gonna die!
|
|
|
|
Post by Ariete on Mar 14, 2019 4:42:49 GMT -5
Because after all this time of fear-mongering about "battling a warmer climate and rising sea-levels" and expecting the worst a warmer climate has to offer (which pales in comparison to what a colder climate would do), these stupid will most likely experience cooler conditions as time goes on. Maybe it won't have much of an effect, maybe it will. But if it does, then they will be very unprepared! Take a look at this graph. Yup, the climate is definitely changing...
Science is by academic definition conservative, as researchers in all fields can only state what they can prove. Some suggest that the result could be even worse. Meanwhile, there is no indication that the climate would suddenly get cooler.
Take a look at this graph. Yup, the climate is definitely changing...
|
|
|
|
Post by 🖕🏿Mörön🖕🏿 on Mar 14, 2019 10:06:39 GMT -5
Perhaps a temperature anomoly range between -1.5C to +1.5C +/- ~0.5C is within the normal variation for the planet's current state and configuration? Did you consider this? Need more data.
|
|
|
|
Post by Ariete on Mar 14, 2019 10:24:09 GMT -5
Perhaps a temperature anomoly range between -1.5C to +1.5C +/- ~0.5C is within the normal variation for the planet's current state and configuration? Did you consider this? Need more data.
|
|
|
|
Post by 🖕🏿Mörön🖕🏿 on Mar 14, 2019 10:45:16 GMT -5
Perhaps a temperature anomoly range between -1.5C to +1.5C +/- ~0.5C is within the normal variation for the planet's current state and configuration? Did you consider this? Need more data.
Excellent. That shows exactly what I am talking about. Pretty much -0.6C to +0.6C. |
|
|
|
Post by urania93 on Mar 14, 2019 10:48:05 GMT -5
When posting a picture like this:  You should post also show the other side of the medal:  Just to post some partial data about limited areas doesn't prove anything, nor disprove it. Nor it does to focus on single weather event much colder or warmer than the average. |
|
|
|
Post by 🖕🏿Mörön🖕🏿 on Mar 14, 2019 11:37:35 GMT -5
Sorry.
This slight moderation suggests more precipitation or at least higher humidity.
|
|
|
|
Post by knot on Mar 14, 2019 12:33:21 GMT -5
Do you know what I find most entertaining? How you fellas are spamming temperature anomaly charts, claiming they show "rapid, unexplained warmth of climate"—contrarywise, these very same charts of yours show some rather petty "increase" in minimums alone, whilst showing a plain decrease in maximums.
Is such a petty difference over bloody century(s) worth of records really something to write home about? In the past, there have been far more drastic changes than this codswallop "change", by which the lot of you are so vexed upon. Methinks the lot of you are wanking your knobs over what the "scientists" have to say a wee bit too much ("97% Consensus" was proven to be a scam), as well as blindly following the narratives of certain political and/or public figures like a herd of sheep.
|
|
|
|
Post by 🖕🏿Mörön🖕🏿 on Mar 14, 2019 12:56:42 GMT -5
Do you know what I find most entertaining? How you fellas are spamming temperature anomaly charts, claiming they show "rapid, unexplained warmth of climate"—contrarywise, these very same charts of yours show some rather petty "increase" in minimums alone, whilst showing a plain decrease in maximums. Is such a petty difference over bloody century(s) worth of records really something to write home about? In the past, there have been far more drastic changes than this codswallop "change", by which the lot of you are so vexed upon. Methinks the lot of you are wanking your knobs over what the "scientists" have to say a wee bit too much ("97% Consensus" was proven to be a scam), as well as blindly following the narratives of certain political and/or public figures like a herd of sheep. Yeah even taking both of those max/min graphs into account the overall trend is still downward. Splitting hairs. |
|
|
|
Post by Ariete on Mar 14, 2019 13:57:06 GMT -5
Yeah even taking both of those max/min graphs into account the overall trend is still downward. Splitting hairs.
The trend is rapidly upward since 1900.
|
|
|
|
Post by 🖕🏿Mörön🖕🏿 on Mar 14, 2019 15:37:32 GMT -5
Yeah even taking both of those max/min graphs into account the overall trend is still downward. Splitting hairs.
The trend is rapidly upward since 1900.
I am talking about the graphs urania and I posted. As for your hockey stick graph, the y axis increments are so small over that time frame that that "rapid" increase is quite disingenuous. What that graph shows actually is just how stable the temps have been overall. The recent increase is not rapid...jajajajajaja bro come on! |
|
|
|
Post by Ariete on Mar 15, 2019 7:14:39 GMT -5
The Turku chief of education told principals that the constitutional right of demonstrating applies also to minors, and the kids who weren't in school today cannot be punished. Well done!
|
|
|
|
Post by urania93 on Mar 15, 2019 10:48:09 GMT -5
Yesterday I (and all the people who work and study in my university) received an email from the university headmaster containing a reminder about the climate change general mobilization, its reasons and the hour and place of the Turin manifestation.
Also, some high school went in mass to the manifestation, in particular last year students who are already older than 18 and can do whatever they want.
People definitively took it seriously, the manifestations in the main cities were very remarkable.
|
|
|
|
Post by nei on Mar 15, 2019 11:26:47 GMT -5
Perhaps a temperature anomoly range between -1.5C to +1.5C +/- ~0.5C is within the normal variation for the planet's current state and configuration? Did you consider this? Need more data. Yes, I did; seems unlikely it's within normal variation, certainly not if the trend continues. What more data would you need? |
|
|
|
Post by knot on Mar 15, 2019 15:42:59 GMT -5
Yesterday I (and all the people who work and study in my university) received an email from the university headmaster containing a reminder about the climate change general mobilization, its reasons and the hour and place of the Turin manifestation. Also, some high school went in mass to the manifestation, in particular last year students who are already older than 18 and can do whatever they want. People definitively took it seriously, the manifestations in the main cities were very remarkable. And what, precisely, is your foremost point by uttering this particular statement? Because I don't see how this codswallop is even slightly supportive of your argument. Most uni-students are not to be taken seriously—the inquisitive scoundrels will believe just about anything their puppet-master professors indoctrinate upon them nowadays.   |
|
|
|
Post by Hlidskjalf on Mar 15, 2019 15:57:20 GMT -5
Climate change is of course real. But man made climate change like the hysteria that is going on these days is total nonsense and detrimental.
Everything points to the fact that we will have an another ice age that will last for 100 000 years, just like the last 50 ice ages have. We are currently at the end of the short burst of warmth that lasts for 10 000 years.
There's no way that co2 will change a cycle that has lasted for at least 500 million years.
What should be troubling more people is the fact that almost all of Europe, Canada and much of the western world will be uninhabitable for life. Arabian countries will however be prosperous, and guess which people who live there and have created their own ethno state as well.
|
|
|
|
Post by urania93 on Mar 16, 2019 5:31:31 GMT -5
Yesterday I (and all the people who work and study in my university) received an email from the university headmaster containing a reminder about the climate change general mobilization, its reasons and the hour and place of the Turin manifestation. Also, some high school went in mass to the manifestation, in particular last year students who are already older than 18 and can do whatever they want. People definitively took it seriously, the manifestations in the main cities were very remarkable. And what, precisely, is your foremost point by uttering this particular statement? Because I don't see how this codswallop is even slightly supportive of your argument. Most uni-students are not to be taken seriously—the inquisitive scoundrels will believe just about anything their puppet-master professors indoctrinate upon them nowadays. So that the general manifestation against global warming was already cited in this thread, I was just reporting that around here a very remarkable number of people decided to support and participate to it. I was actually surprised by the number of participants, I wasn't really expecting it. Anyway, it is evidently mostly a way to show the general consensus of people living in a certain place about a certain topic, so a socio-political report of the situation. There is zero climate science information in it. |
|
