|
|
Post by tij on Mar 6, 2019 12:41:37 GMT -5
   I'll go with Budapest due to more extreme records and less lag. Presume Montauk's sunshine distribution is similar to Providence and is thus NZ-ish, but not typically oceanic, but Budapest has high winter/summer differences more like Eastern than Oceanic NW Europe. However, Budapest has a lower continentality index since it is at a higher latitude. Ariete ๐๐ฟMรถrรถn๐๐ฟ fixed |
|
|
|
Post by Ariete on Mar 6, 2019 13:00:43 GMT -5
tij Iโm gonna say it so Ariete doesnโt have to. Please paste in images of the climate boxes. Come on. Twice in one day?
|
|
|
|
Post by ๐๐ฟMรถrรถn๐๐ฟ on Mar 6, 2019 13:11:37 GMT -5
Not voting out of protest, fucken.
|
|
|
|
Post by Steelernation on Mar 6, 2019 15:01:14 GMT -5
Budapest easily. Hotter summers, colder winters, more extreme records.
|
|
|
|
Post by Babu on Mar 6, 2019 15:43:53 GMT -5
Oceanity and continentality aren't opposites imo. Montauk is both very continental and oceanic imo, because I view oceanic and maritime synonymously.
|
|
|
|
Post by knot on Mar 6, 2019 15:47:00 GMT -5
Budapest is FAR more continental; not even a contest.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 6, 2019 15:47:05 GMT -5
Montauk for having a slightly higher annual range and lower latitude. Lower latitude should be considered as a factor that increases continentality as climates at lower latitudes tend to have lower annual range. Records don't matter imo.
|
|
|
|
Post by ๐๐ฟMรถrรถn๐๐ฟ on Mar 6, 2019 18:20:37 GMT -5
Budapest is more continental by far...
|
|
|
|
Post by Crunch41 on Mar 6, 2019 18:45:20 GMT -5
Budapest. More extreme temperature records, less seasonal lag and a spring/summer rain peak. Montauk has a fall/winter peak more common in oceanic climates.
|
|
