|
Post by ๐๐ฟMรถrรถn๐๐ฟ on Mar 20, 2019 22:25:42 GMT -5
I'll give this one a C or C+ rating. It's a bit boring but pretty nice overall. Just needs colder winters. Anyway, I decreased temps by 20C and added 70mm of precipitation in every month. Decreased sunshine hours by 100 for each month as well.
|
|
|
Post by knot on Mar 20, 2019 22:28:11 GMT -5
D+; absolute codswallop.
|
|
|
Post by ๐๐ฟMรถrรถn๐๐ฟ on Mar 20, 2019 22:29:20 GMT -5
Dโ; absolute codswallop. Care to explain further, matey?
|
|
|
Post by Steelernation on Mar 20, 2019 22:29:41 GMT -5
Not great, doesnโt suck. D+.
|
|
|
Post by knot on Mar 20, 2019 22:31:57 GMT -5
๐๐ฟMรถrรถn๐๐ฟ Straddles the 17ยฐ-23ยฐ C range for FAR too long, as well as yielding suicidally stable summers.
|
|
|
Post by ๐๐ฟMรถrรถn๐๐ฟ on Mar 20, 2019 22:33:45 GMT -5
๐๐ฟMรถrรถn๐๐ฟ Straddles the 17ยฐ-23ยฐ C range for FAR too long, as well as yielding suicidally stable summers. Good point. I have henceforth revised my rating to a D+ for this infuriating climate.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 20, 2019 22:38:43 GMT -5
C+. About 4-5C too cool year-round. Never reaching 30C kind of sucks. Precip and sunshine are decent. I will assume humidity is higher than stated in the chart.
|
|
|
Post by jgtheone on Mar 20, 2019 23:33:44 GMT -5
D+. Probably one of the better ice age climates, along with Dallol.
|
|
|
Post by tij on Mar 20, 2019 23:39:16 GMT -5
This is a B/B+. Far better than the original! Very nice and even sunshine and precip. Diurnal ranges are interesting, but a bit higher than my preference during winter, and nights are too cool during summer. Bit too much snow as well, and even I would crave a bit more heat potential. Winter record lows are quite mild tho!
|
|
|
Post by Hlidskjalf on Mar 21, 2019 2:30:09 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Beercules on Mar 21, 2019 3:05:12 GMT -5
E
Sucks ass
|
|
|
Post by Lommaren on Mar 21, 2019 7:29:49 GMT -5
B- assuming sun strength was okay.
|
|
|
Post by sari on Mar 21, 2019 12:32:10 GMT -5
Warm and sunny Sky Valley, B. Probably could be achieved in real life by elevating Mecca really high.
|
|
|
Post by Speagles84 on Jul 26, 2019 19:06:51 GMT -5
E yuck
|
|
|
Post by Babu on Jul 26, 2019 19:20:13 GMT -5
A
|
|
|
Post by P London on Jul 27, 2019 6:25:16 GMT -5
Very nice beautiful give it an A- Would be nice to go bck 10,000 years to see all those Megafaunal Mammals sad that they all died out.
|
|
|
Post by nei on Jul 27, 2019 10:12:58 GMT -5
decent climate; but unrealistically cool. Difference between the ice age and modern-day globally is 5ยฐC; a tropical place would be less than that but Mecca maybe not much since it's not ocean influenced. Can't remember if Mecca was wet then; I know the Sahara was.
|
|
|
Post by ๐๐ฟMรถrรถn๐๐ฟ on Jul 27, 2019 10:55:15 GMT -5
decent climate; but unrealistically cool. Difference between the ice age and modern-day globally is 5ยฐC; a tropical place would be less than that but Mecca maybe not much since it's not ocean influenced. Can't remember if Mecca was wet then; I know the Sahara was. Depends which ice age we're talking about.
|
|
|
Post by nei on Jul 27, 2019 10:56:50 GMT -5
decent climate; but unrealistically cool. Difference between the ice age and modern-day globally is 5ยฐC; a tropical place would be less than that but Mecca maybe not much since it's not ocean influenced. Can't remember if Mecca was wet then; I know the Sahara was. Depends which ice age we're talking about. anything during the Pleistocene was similar at the coldest; previous ice ages? continents were in totally different places so "ice age, mecca" wouldn't make sense
|
|
|
Post by Ethereal on Mar 9, 2022 0:49:59 GMT -5
15C decrease might've been better. Looks like a highland climate in South America now.
D-
|
|