|
|
Post by Lommaren on May 17, 2019 12:19:16 GMT -5
Two rather undesirable climates in the eyes of most people battle it out here, both with corresponding averages for 2002-2018 to provide fairness.
Tromsø's sunshine has obviously increased a bit since 1961-1990, but neither Météo Climat nor Infoclimat has it properly listed since more than a decade. Anyway, Kiruna's sunshine rose by as much as 4.8 % in the same time from 1,484 hours to 1,559 hours, so by the same metric Tromsø could/should be about 1,325 hours today, maybe even more than that, given its coastal position and quite warm summers recently.
My choice is Tromsø for the better winters, more snow and better temperatures to be outside in during that sizeable portion of the year affected by the polar night. Kiruna on the other hand has a way better July, but even as early as the next month Tromsø catches up and is far more liveable for most of the year.
E- vs F+
|
|
|
|
Post by 🖕🏿Mörön🖕🏿 on May 17, 2019 12:52:10 GMT -5
Kiruna, fuckaaaaaan!
|
|
|
|
Post by Lommaren on May 17, 2019 12:53:44 GMT -5
Care to explain your decision?  🖕🏿Mörön🖕🏿 -san Is Tromsø mild bullshit in winter? |
|
|
|
Post by omegaraptor on May 17, 2019 12:54:14 GMT -5
Tromsø, FUCKAAAAAAAN!
|
|
|
|
Post by 🖕🏿Mörön🖕🏿 on May 17, 2019 12:56:15 GMT -5
Care to explain your decision? 🖕🏿Mörön🖕🏿 -san Is Tromsø mild bullshit in winter? yes....too warm in late fall and early winter |
|
|
|
Post by Ariete on May 17, 2019 13:29:27 GMT -5
Kiruna because of some kind of crummer.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 17, 2019 14:39:02 GMT -5
Tromso, no contest. Still a gay F-rated climate though.
|
|
|
|
Post by Babu on May 17, 2019 15:02:10 GMT -5
How is it that you've still not learned how to use eKlima? It's climate robot that does all the work for you and all you have to do is sign up lol.
|
|
|
|
Post by Babu on May 17, 2019 15:06:32 GMT -5
Although Meterologiskt institutt can eat a dick. There are like one or two stations with consistent sunshine data, and that's Oslo and I think Bergen does too. Maybe a couple more but that's it.  |
|
|
|
Post by Steelernation on May 17, 2019 16:33:28 GMT -5
Kiruna. Warmer summers and drier.
|
|
|
|
Post by knot on May 17, 2019 17:15:07 GMT -5
Tromsø, FUCKAAAAAAAN!
|
|
|
|
Post by Crunch41 on May 17, 2019 23:24:02 GMT -5
Is there a difference in precipitation days? Tromsø is twice as wet.
In any case, Kiruna wins for having warmer summers and more seasonal variation. The warmer fall and warmer nights in general in Tromsø don't help offset the short cool summer.
|
|
|
|
Post by Lommaren on May 18, 2019 5:45:19 GMT -5
Is there a difference in precipitation days? Tromsø is twice as wet. In any case, Kiruna wins for having warmer summers and more seasonal variation. The warmer fall and warmer nights in general in Tromsø don't help offset the short cool summer. The 1961-1990 NOAA numbers suggested more than 190 precipitation days for Kiruna, but I'm a bit skeptical of that. Having said that, drizzle will still be more common there. One thing is for sure though, Kiruna will have more than half of what Tromsø has for sure though. |
|
|
|
Post by Babu on May 18, 2019 11:10:26 GMT -5
SMHI uses 0.1mm thresholds. Hence the 190 days
|
|
|
|
Post by sari on May 18, 2019 12:28:03 GMT -5
Kiruna. Simply far more interesting, and a bit less polar night too. Tromsø is a dull EverBlack climate.
|
|
|
|
Post by Hlidskjalf on May 18, 2019 12:54:15 GMT -5
Maybe Tromso, but I would have committed suicide long before the end of November in that god forsaken hell hole.
|
|
|
|
Post by Hiromant on May 20, 2019 7:49:18 GMT -5
Kiruna any day. Tromso is an embarrassment for the latitude and has suicide fuel sunshine hours.
|
|
|
|
Post by Morningrise on May 20, 2019 17:45:52 GMT -5
Kiruna for having warmer summers and more sunshine.
|
|
