|
|
Post by Yahya Sinwar on Oct 8, 2019 11:07:20 GMT -5
tij Why can’t you just use real stats? Also you’re still missing a weatherbox. Because it’s easier to push his boteving agenda with fake stats . Why the hell would you join a weather forum but be disingenuous and use false stats? |
|
|
|
Post by tij on Oct 8, 2019 19:09:38 GMT -5
Yahya Sinwar other sites (weatherspark, weatheronline.co.uk) as i have stated corroborate the data I presented, showing an annual mean of 15.8 in recent years
|
|
|
|
Post by AJ1013 on Oct 8, 2019 19:18:29 GMT -5
Yahya Sinwar other sites (weatherspark, weatheronline.co.uk) as i have stated corroborate the data I presented, showing an annual mean of 15.8 in recent years You ever gonna post a weatherbox? That's the reason nobody has voted. |
|
|
|
Post by tij on Oct 8, 2019 19:41:53 GMT -5
Im trying yo find italian met data as well at this point AJ1013 |
|
|
|
Post by rozenn on Oct 11, 2019 18:22:13 GMT -5
The official wiki data has an average annual high of 63.5°F, which - surprise surprise - is akin to Portland, OR - also at 45°N latitude. Portland isn’t by a warm sea, hence the cooler lows - but Portland is capable of much stronger heatwaves than Trieste. Raleigh has an average annual high of 71.7°F which utterly crushes Trieste. Highs matter much more than lows in determining how warm a climate really feels - despite what the drunk Russian’s system (and also the drunk American’s system, to a greater degree) may suggest. en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bergen#Climateen.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alturas,_California#Climate Old comparison but holds true. Here are two climates. Bergen is technically warmer based on annual mean, but that’s pretty much irrelevant. Alturas has four proper seasons and a real summer. Bergen has 7 months of oceanic slop, barely existent shoulder seasons, and a short weak crummer. Not to mention Alturas’ altitude and latitude means that sun strength isn’t even a comparison. Comparing the highs only is doing half the work. Yes means are much more relevant than highs when trying to figure out which climate is warmer. Monaco has similar highs to Paris in summer, but there's no denying it's still a considerably warmer summer climate if you spend enough time in both locales to experience it first hand. |
|
|
|
Post by Ariete on Oct 12, 2019 4:37:04 GMT -5
Terribly wrong—what if we were to compare a 20° / 25° C summer that's very stable and rarely hits 30° C, to a 5° / 35° C summer that frequently exceeds >40° C? The latter would feel much warmer, and it's not even close. Means = jackshit.
What it "feels like" for you means jackshit. Mean temps are very relevant.
|
|
|
|
Post by rozenn on Oct 13, 2019 5:56:18 GMT -5
The 20/25°C climate is warmer. Simples. But of course it's comparing apples to oranges.
Now comparing 2 months I' ve experienced, July 2019 in Paris had a warmer avg high than August 2015 in Nice, and with much more extreme high temps to boot. Yet you'd have to be utterly insane to state that it felt warmer overall. Means certainly don't mean jackshit.
|
|
|
|
Post by jetshnl on Mar 9, 2022 1:10:46 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by CRISPR on Feb 25, 2024 1:56:06 GMT -5
Solid C-, dragged down by being cloudy.
|
|
