|
|
Post by massiveshibe on Aug 16, 2022 11:56:56 GMT -5
Seattle because it may get snow during winter. The winters of San Francisco are a joke.
|
|
|
|
Post by alex992 on Aug 16, 2022 12:14:01 GMT -5
That’s a moot point. We are battling Seattle vs SF, not anywhere else. Nothing else in the battle matters except for the weatherboxes shown. It does matter, because the 680 corridor (places like Vallejo, Concord, Walnut Creek etc) are suburbs of SF with much warmer summers, while no Seattle suburbs have warmer summers than Seattle due to being wedged right against the Cascades The climate battle is Seattle vs San Francisco. Not Seattle vs Vallejo, Concord, and Walnut Creek. So yes, it is a moot point. |
|
|
|
Post by 🖕🏿Mörön🖕🏿 on Aug 16, 2022 12:16:20 GMT -5
That’s a moot point. We are battling Seattle vs SF, not anywhere else. Nothing else in the battle matters except for the weatherboxes shown. It does matter, because the 680 corridor (places like Vallejo, Concord, Walnut Creek etc) are suburbs of SF with much warmer summers, while no Seattle suburbs have warmer summers than Seattle due to being wedged right against the Cascades Drive to Yakima then and quitcher bitchin'. |
|
|
|
Post by firebird1988 on Aug 16, 2022 13:13:02 GMT -5
It does matter, because the 680 corridor (places like Vallejo, Concord, Walnut Creek etc) are suburbs of SF with much warmer summers, while no Seattle suburbs have warmer summers than Seattle due to being wedged right against the Cascades Drive to Yakima then and quitcher bitchin'. Yakima is nowhere near Seattle |
|
|
|
Post by psychedamike24 on Aug 17, 2022 1:41:50 GMT -5
That’s a moot point. We are battling Seattle vs SF, not anywhere else. Nothing else in the battle matters except for the weatherboxes shown. It does matter, because the 680 corridor (places like Vallejo, Concord, Walnut Creek etc) are suburbs of SF with much warmer summers, while no Seattle suburbs have warmer summers than Seattle due to being wedged right against the Cascades On the Windy app, there's a clear temperature gradient on summer days between Seattle + the northern suburbs closer to the Salish Sea, versus the inland eastern suburbs and the southern suburbs closer to Tacoma. |
|
|
|
Post by CRISPR on Feb 16, 2024 20:10:24 GMT -5
San Francisco for being warmer and sunnier
|
|
|
|
Post by Benfxmth on Jul 5, 2024 6:51:15 GMT -5
San Francisco, a little less shit. Both of these climates belong in the Koppen group of "Scb", i.e. suicidally boring.
|
|
|
|
Post by arcleo on Jul 5, 2024 7:58:36 GMT -5
San Francisco, for milder and sunnier winters
|
|
|
|
Post by Crunch41 on Jul 5, 2024 18:31:42 GMT -5
Seattle I guess. I haven't visited there in winter though, if it is really as bad as people say I might have to change my answer. San Francisco is tolerable just very boring.
|
|
|
|
Post by Ethereal on Jul 5, 2024 19:06:02 GMT -5
San Francisco just for the sun. Seattle has nothing to sacrifice for...
|
|
