|
|
Post by Lommaren on Apr 13, 2018 6:28:52 GMT -5
Looks like a Seattle that "escalated quickly". Probably about 1,200-1,300 hours of sunshine only though judging by the months in which stats were available. I'll still give it a D+ the non-rainy days will have been very nice in summer and in addition, shoulder seasons have way better potential than you'd expect from a place bordering the "perpetual June twilight line". It narrowly loses to a normal year in Nyköping though due to the excessive gloominess and rainfall. In a normal year, Bergen is no better than an E...  |
|
|
|
Post by knot on Apr 13, 2018 7:12:58 GMT -5
D+, by maritime standards. These "warmest months" Norwegian climates are a fucken disgrace to the country  Bergen proper is tenfold better! |
|
|
|
Post by Beercules on Apr 13, 2018 9:48:56 GMT -5
Gay
E
|
|
|
|
Post by Mörön on Apr 13, 2018 11:55:32 GMT -5
E
Gay
|
|
|
|
Post by Nidaros on Apr 13, 2018 13:06:14 GMT -5
Looks like a Seattle that "escalated quickly". Probably about 1,200-1,300 hours of sunshine only though judging by the months in which stats were available. I'll still give it a D+ the non-rainy days will have been very nice in summer and in addition, shoulder seasons have way better potential than you'd expect from a place bordering the "perpetual June twilight line". It narrowly loses to a normal year in Nyköping though due to the excessive gloominess and rainfall. In a normal year, Bergen is no better than an E... What a wet winter that would be, Dec alone has nearly 60 % of what Trondheim get annually. A few comments: Old sunhrs data for Bergen are flawed as the recorder was in the shadow of the Ulriken mt. The new sunrecorder is better placed and has recorded on average 300 - 400 hrs more annually than the old one. So I should guess 1600 - 1900 sunhrs for a year like that if the new sunrecorder had been operating. Also what about that mean max? Do you mean the actual record high for that month? The record high for the warmest Oct (1961) with mean 11.3c was 20.9c. The warmest Feb had record high 12.4c if you mean Feb 2014, which had record low -3.3c. |
|
|
|
Post by Cadeau on Apr 13, 2018 13:11:34 GMT -5
The coldest month and warmest month's average mean? A+! Though seasonal lag in spring is a critically defective feature, also four times more precipitation than the ideal. C-/D+.
|
|
|
|
Post by Lommaren on Apr 13, 2018 13:19:30 GMT -5
What a wet winter that would be, Dec alone has nearly 60 % of what Trondheim get annually. A few comments: Old sunhrs data for Bergen are flawed as the recorder was in the shadow of the Ulriken mt. The new sunrecorder is better placed and has recorded on average 300 - 400 hrs more annually than the old one. So I should guess 1600 - 1900 sunhrs for a year like that if the new sunrecorder had been operating. Also what about that mean max? Do you mean the actual record high for that month? The record high for the warmest Oct (1961) with mean 11.3c was 20.9c. The warmest Feb had record high 12.4c if you mean Feb 2014, which had record low -3.3c. Older years had some incomplete data, I think that was why October 1961 fell short. As for 2014 I went by Météo Climat's numbers so I'm not sure about if everything correlates. Also, there was an equal month in mean that I had intended to use so I might have mixed up the record high for those two months after I saw the high/low was higher for 2014. Yes, by the way, mean max is warmest recorded temp; this is supposed to be rated as a real climate rather than a year  |
|
|
|
Post by Steelernation on Apr 13, 2018 14:04:24 GMT -5
F+
|
|
Bergen proper is tenfold better!
Lived:
Residence:
