Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 4, 2018 12:45:57 GMT -5
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 4, 2018 12:46:32 GMT -5
F, what else?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 4, 2018 12:47:29 GMT -5
i gave it an E-. still better than the likes of vostok and dallol.
|
|
|
|
Post by Lommaren on Jun 4, 2018 13:02:56 GMT -5
Big progress with the location name in capitals  As far as the climate: F with a ton of minuses behind it. I don't know whether even shalop would like this one... |
|
|
|
Post by irlinit on Jun 4, 2018 13:38:13 GMT -5
F for fucking abysmal
|
|
|
|
Post by Steelernation on Jun 4, 2018 14:05:38 GMT -5
F-.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 4, 2018 14:07:37 GMT -5
Even Mars has a better climate than this piece of shit. F-----.
|
|
|
|
Post by Ariete on Jun 4, 2018 14:48:11 GMT -5
A+ on polar standards, F- by all other standards.
|
|
|
|
Post by ๐๐ฟMรถrรถn๐๐ฟ on Jun 4, 2018 14:57:17 GMT -5
Solidly frozen C-
Winter is a bit long and it's way too dry year-round, but I would honestly enjoy it there from April-September with the insanely high sunshine hours and cool temps.
|
|
|
|
Post by Lommaren on Jun 4, 2018 15:49:23 GMT -5
A+ on polar standards, F- by all other standards. With that you mean ultra-arctic/antarctic-polar surely? Maritime polar on lower latitudes like Svalbard and even Barrow are both miles better than this one! |
|
|
|
Post by Babu on Jun 4, 2018 15:59:50 GMT -5
A+ on polar standards, F- by all other standards. With that you mean ultra-arctic/antarctic-polar surely? Maritime polar on lower latitudes like Svalbard and even Barrow are both miles better than this one!  |
|
|
|
Post by alex992 on Jun 4, 2018 16:08:18 GMT -5
Of course it hasn't been done before, because we know it's gonna be unanimously Fs across the board for the most part. Same reason rating climate like Eureka, Nunavut or Vostok is pointless.
I give it an E, way too cold and dry year around, winter is the only time of year that's acceptable but still too cold.
|
|
|
|
Post by knot on Jun 4, 2018 16:32:58 GMT -5
Eโ. The very definition of Cold Fucken Desert, but it's still much more exciting than the likes of Honolulu, San Diego, San Francisco and all that wicked sort (pretty much all below an F).
|
|
|
|
Post by Beercules on Jun 4, 2018 20:59:23 GMT -5
F-
nothing even remotely acceptable and livable about this abyss. Wonder what the sunshine hours are.
|
|
|
|
Post by Giorbanguly on Jun 4, 2018 22:11:40 GMT -5
Cold and miserable, absolutely nothing redeeming about it. I'll have to go into the Greek Alphabet to rate it accurately. ฮฉ- or ฮจ-
|
|
|
|
Post by shalop on Jun 6, 2018 9:44:20 GMT -5
Lommaren It's all right but the summers are too cold: C+
|
|
|
|
Post by Crunch41 on Jun 17, 2018 17:56:45 GMT -5
F, terrible cold with no summer. Not the worst climate on earth, though.
How are the record highs so mild in the winter months? Especially February, which is 36C above average. It's polar night for most of the winter, so the sun isn't warming it up. Is it strong winds from the south bringing mild air? Or some kind of fรถhn wind?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 17, 2018 18:35:32 GMT -5
F---
Would be interesting to see how it would do against London.
|
|
|
|
Post by knot on Jun 18, 2018 9:18:17 GMT -5
F--- Would be interesting to see how it would do against London. Poorly; even by my fairly extreme standards, London actually beats this cold fucken desertโmostly due to me assuming it has low precipitation, of course  |
|
