|
|
Post by alex992 on Jun 5, 2018 21:53:24 GMT -5
So the mountain magically increased in height from 1500 m to 2200 m, and now magically it's located on another planet. Got it.
Just admit that this is an unrealistic climate and that you didn't think it through and be done with it. Your further "justifications" for this climate isn't helping your case.
|
|
|
|
Post by Babu on Jun 6, 2018 7:29:48 GMT -5
Come on guys. Schlomnerg doesn't have the laws of physics of Earth. It's on another planet with different laws of physics. Why is this so hard to understand? Ugh.   |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 6, 2018 9:20:40 GMT -5
Lol, the laws of physics are consistent across the universe. This planet clearly exists in an alternate universe, or indeed within the vivid imagination of Sir Schlommo.
|
|
|
|
Post by nei on Jun 6, 2018 12:56:46 GMT -5
With a different planet that's still earth-like [surface is a mix of ocean and land, and the only precipitation is in the from solid/liquid water], biggest change I could think would be from a different surface pressure if the air density or surface gravity is different from earth. Would change the lapse rate or ground-mountain temperature difference; and what temperature difference you'd need to get lake effect snow?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 6, 2018 13:01:16 GMT -5
Are you honestly still theorizing over this BS? Schlommo just got high on milk and created a crazy ass climate, end of  |
|
|
|
Post by Ariete on Jun 6, 2018 15:05:33 GMT -5
Not to mention that it's an inland location but still has a severe seasonal lag. How? Even if it's a big-ass lake, there is no way than September would be warmer than June and October as warm as May, especially with all the sun they get during the highest sun angle season. Look at like Milwaukee, Salt Lake City or Makhachkala, they are all continental in pattern regardless of them being on the shores of some of the biggest lakes on the planet. Makhgklhfjfkjkala is actually a good example. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Makhachkala#Climate Similar average lows in winter, latitude that fits. The Caspian sea has high-low heat potential, high in summer, low in winter. But in Schlomberg this is not visible at all. 7 months with average highs over 70F would never allow the temps to fall as low as your averages any time of the year, as the lake would be sufficiently warm. Compare to that Russian place.
Ocean to the west, lake to the east = humid. It's impossible to have 25-50% RH year-round.
This climate is so physically wrong on so many level's it's an automatic F- from me. |
|
|
|
Post by Ariete on Jun 6, 2018 15:13:13 GMT -5
The other explanation might be that the cultural marxists, #swedenpolice, Somalis, social democrats and cell phone link tower radiation makes this unrealistic climate possible.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 6, 2018 15:26:43 GMT -5
Not sure what to make of it. Almost like a California climate but with ridiculous winter diurnals. C-.
|
|
|
|
Post by jgtheone on Mar 5, 2021 7:33:58 GMT -5
C-, even though it's unrealistic. Winters have too much of a diurnal range, if the temperature progression was more steady then my rating would increase.
|
|
|
|
Post by Benfxmth on Mar 5, 2021 7:39:20 GMT -5
A C from me, though it's unrealistic
|
|
|
|
Post by alex992 on Mar 5, 2021 18:03:59 GMT -5
F because it's stupid and unrealistic.
|
|
|
|
Post by srfoskey on Mar 5, 2021 19:49:10 GMT -5
With a different planet that's still earth-like [surface is a mix of ocean and land, and the only precipitation is in the from solid/liquid water], biggest change I could think would be from a different surface pressure if the air density or surface gravity is different from earth. Would change the lapse rate or ground-mountain temperature difference; and what temperature difference you'd need to get lake effect snow? On Earth, you typically need a 13°C difference between the surface and 850 mb, but it can be as low as 10°C if there's synoptic-scale forcing.
|
|
|
|
Post by Benfxmth on Mar 5, 2021 19:50:52 GMT -5
It goes against the laws of physics to have a 64°F average high combined with 11" of snow in January.
|
|
|
|
Post by srfoskey on Mar 5, 2021 20:02:34 GMT -5
With a different planet that's still earth-like [surface is a mix of ocean and land, and the only precipitation is in the from solid/liquid water], biggest change I could think would be from a different surface pressure if the air density or surface gravity is different from earth. Would change the lapse rate or ground-mountain temperature difference; and what temperature difference you'd need to get lake effect snow? On Earth, you typically need a 13°C difference between the surface and 850 mb, but it can be as low as 10°C if there's synoptic-scale forcing.
Also I give it a C+, ignoring concerns about realism.
It is too cool in summer, too mild in winter, and too dry in spring.
Furthermore, Raleigh had a 63/43 month with 17.8" of snow, so a month as shown in the weatherbox isn't impossible per se, it's just Lommaren's physical explanation doesn't make any sense.
|
|
|
|
Post by Giorbanguly on Mar 6, 2021 5:50:02 GMT -5
This is a GOAT thread
|
|
|
|
Post by Cadeau on Mar 10, 2021 13:03:00 GMT -5
B. The main complaint is excessive sunshine hours.
|
|
|
|
Post by Speagles84 on Mar 10, 2021 13:04:57 GMT -5
F for fucking stupid. Nearly 40" of snow when the coldest month has an average high of 63F, of course this is a Lommaren climate
|
|
|
|
Post by desiccatedi85 on Sept 1, 2023 8:39:55 GMT -5
It's weird but not bad. With those average highs snow that does fall must melt rapidly, thankfully. Plus the Mediterranean precip pattern helps it out. I'll give it a B.
|
|
|
|
Post by Benfxmth on Sept 1, 2023 8:42:13 GMT -5
It's weird but not bad. With those average highs snow that does fall must melt rapidly, thankfully. Plus the Mediterranean precip pattern helps it out. I'll give it a B. This climate completely defies the laws of realism and physics, it's penis mcghee-tier unrealistic. In Schlommo's wild imagination, that lake effect snow forms completely from magic, when lakes would remain well above freezing, thus make it impossible. |
|
|
|
Post by desiccatedi85 on Sept 1, 2023 8:43:42 GMT -5
It's weird but not bad. With those average highs snow that does fall must melt rapidly, thankfully. Plus the Mediterranean precip pattern helps it out. I'll give it a B. This climate completely defies the laws of realism and physics, it's penis mcghee-tier unrealistic. In Schlommo's wild imagination, that lake effect snow forms completely from magic, when lakes would remain well above freezing, thus make it impossible. Yeah sure it's unrealistic, but I'm just rating what I see in the climobox. |
|
Lived:
Residence:
