|
|
Post by grega94 on Jun 10, 2018 16:52:35 GMT -5
There are only two subarctic climates that I could find that has a hottest average high of 26C or greater. These two are Seneca and Sretensk one is a high elevation climate with very cold nights and wetter winters and the other is a very continental climate with long cold winters and short hot and wet summers. Which one do you rate higher? |
|
|
|
Post by alex992 on Jun 10, 2018 17:00:12 GMT -5
Sretensk is quite epic, so I'd take that one. Though it could be a lot wetter.
|
|
|
|
Post by Steelernation on Jun 10, 2018 17:27:23 GMT -5
Seneca for the drier summers, warmer winters and epic summer diurnals. Probably snowier as well.
|
|
|
|
Post by ilmc90 on Jun 10, 2018 17:30:21 GMT -5
Seneca for the warmer winters.
|
|
|
|
Post by knot on Jun 10, 2018 17:52:11 GMT -5
Seneca, Oregon fucken!Rather an adequate climate notwithstanding its pitiful "precipitation", of course. Russian climates are always gay; Sretensk is gay not only because of its cold fucken desert nature, but also its stupidly high polar penguin latitude of 52Β° Fucken North...ugly long summer gaylight and short winter gaylight 
|
|
|
|
Post by grega94 on Jun 10, 2018 19:31:59 GMT -5
Seneca, Oregon fucken!Rather an adequate climate notwithstanding its pitiful "precipitation", of course. Russian climates are always gay; Sretensk is gay not only because of its cold fucken desert nature, but also its stupidly high polar penguin latitude of 52Β° Fucken North...ugly long summer gaylight and short winter gaylight Sretensk doesn't really look like a desert though. I couldn't find any streetview of it, but here is the same river that flows through the town but more downstream. Streetview linkAnd here is an aerial photo of Sretensk. aerial photo linkAnd here is a street view link of Seneca Streetview linkThat being said I voted for Seneca too, but only because Sretensk's winters are way too cold. |
|
|
|
Post by jgtheone on Jun 10, 2018 19:36:02 GMT -5
Seneca since you have less chance of dying
|
|
|
|
Post by Beercules on Jun 10, 2018 20:23:45 GMT -5
Seneca despite its terrible crummer lows
|
|
|
|
Post by ππΏMΓΆrΓΆnππΏ on Jun 10, 2018 22:57:04 GMT -5
Sretensk is quite epic, so I'd take that one. Though it could be a lot wetter. My thoughts as well. Irkutsk is similar but has significantly warmer winters. |
|
|
|
Post by grega94 on Jun 10, 2018 23:23:43 GMT -5
Sretensk is quite epic, so I'd take that one. Though it could be a lot wetter. My thoughts as well. Irkutsk is similar but has significantly warmer winters. Except that Irkutsk has 4 months with means >10C which makes it a continental climate rather than a subarctic one, the ones I listed only have 3 months with means >10C. |
|
|
|
Post by ππΏMΓΆrΓΆnππΏ on Jun 10, 2018 23:31:10 GMT -5
My thoughts as well. Irkutsk is similar but has significantly warmer winters. Except that Irkutsk has 4 months with means >10C which makes it a continental climate rather than a subarctic one, the ones I listed only have 3 months with means >10C. Except that Sretensk barely qualifies and both are borderline Dwc/Dwb. 9.8C in May for Sretensk and 10.2C in Irkutsk. Hardly any difference and for all intents and purposes essentially the same. |
|
|
|
Post by Babu on Jun 11, 2018 0:03:23 GMT -5
I'd probably take Seneca over UmeΓ₯.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 11, 2018 9:07:32 GMT -5
good finds. seneca is an a-climate, while sretensk is D+
|
|
|
|
Post by Morningrise on Jun 11, 2018 13:38:07 GMT -5
As much as I strongly prefer Sretensk's summers and precipitation pattern, those winters are bad enough that I'm gonna have to with Seneca instead.
|
|
|
|
Post by Crunch41 on Jun 18, 2018 22:15:19 GMT -5
What Morningrise said. Sretensk has much better summers but the winter is awful. Seneca gets more snow and isn't as cold. Both are on the dry side.
Edit: I would pick Irkutsk over Seneca if it qualified
|
|
