|
|
Post by ๐๐ฟMรถrรถn๐๐ฟ on Mar 1, 2019 2:10:02 GMT -5
 Using random.org, I put the top 12 snowiest months in Vancouver in random order like so: 1. 2008 Dec 2. 1996 Dec 3. 1971 Dec 4. 1916 Feb 5. 1954 Jan 6. 1971 Jan 7. 1964 Dec 8. 1917 Feb 9. 1935 Jan 10. 1901 Jan 11. 1913 Jan 12. 1950 Jan For reference, Feb 2019 through the 27th has averaged 3.7C/-3.1C with 31.2cm of snow. Max temp of 8.5 and a min of -8.8C. I'll give it a C- rating. It could definitely be sunnier but I don't mind the average temps. Record highs could be a lot higher too.  |
|
|
|
Post by Beercules on Mar 1, 2019 2:12:24 GMT -5
F.
Rather be dead, bummed by a 12" black cock, etc
|
|
|
|
Post by knot on Mar 1, 2019 2:22:05 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by tij on Mar 1, 2019 2:55:34 GMT -5
E+  What have you done to such a gorgeous climate? You have turned it into some kind of subpolar tundra! |
|
|
|
Post by knot on Mar 1, 2019 3:04:43 GMT -5
E+ What have you done to such a gorgeous climate? You have turned it into some kind of subpolar tundra!Vancouver's already a subpolar tundraโonly this time, it's with year-round snowfall instead of cold rain.  |
|
|
|
Post by jgtheone on Mar 1, 2019 3:09:05 GMT -5
big F, that's gross
|
|
|
|
Post by alex992 on Mar 1, 2019 8:10:24 GMT -5
Snowfall amount is epic, but far too seasonless for me and I don't want snow in the middle of summer lol. Give it an E.
|
|
|
|
Post by Speagles84 on Mar 1, 2019 8:27:48 GMT -5
Using random.org, I put the top 12 snowiest months in Vancouver in random order like so: 1. 2008 Dec 2. 1996 Dec 3. 1971 Dec 4. 1916 Feb 5. 1954 Jan 6. 1971 Jan 7. 1964 Dec 8. 1917 Feb 9. 1935 Jan 10. 1901 Jan 11. 1913 Jan 12. 1950 Jan For reference, Feb 2019 through the 27th has averaged 3.7C/-3.1C with 31.2cm of snow. Max temp of 8.5 and a min of -8.8C. I'll give it a C- rating. It could definitely be sunnier but I don't mind the average temps. Record highs could be a lot higher too. Vancouver has had 12 months with 30"+ of snow?? |
|
|
|
Post by Steelernation on Mar 1, 2019 9:01:26 GMT -5
F-
|
|
|
|
Post by ๐๐ฟMรถrรถn๐๐ฟ on Mar 1, 2019 10:09:04 GMT -5
Speagles84Yes, exactly 12 months with over 30". And at least 20 months with over 23.9" or 60.7cm.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 1, 2019 12:16:43 GMT -5
F
|
|
|
|
Post by Giorbanguly on Mar 1, 2019 21:27:23 GMT -5
Jesus Christ Candle, you invented one of the worst climates I've ever seen
|
|
|
|
Post by sari on Mar 1, 2019 21:52:06 GMT -5
That's called a glacier.
C- because at least it's habitable.
|
|
|
|
Post by omegaraptor on Mar 2, 2019 0:31:39 GMT -5
It's a miserable tundra with very little, if anything, to like.
F.
|
|
|
|
Post by Crunch41 on Mar 2, 2019 23:49:01 GMT -5
F, that is a terrible climate, I do NOT like.
A+ idea, too bad it looks like this. Maybe in a climate like Denver it would look better? Somewhere that has snowy springs with some warm days. Or do snowiest Norilsk or something and make it a ice cap climate.
|
|
|
|
Post by CRISPR on Dec 31, 2023 23:09:15 GMT -5
F, as nothing can grow with that insane amount of snowfall. The only tiny saving grace is that it will never get extraordinarily cold
|
|
|
|
Post by Cheeseman on Dec 31, 2023 23:10:53 GMT -5
F for obvious reasons.
|
|
|
|
Post by AJ1013 on Dec 31, 2023 23:14:27 GMT -5
ร+ for obvious reasons
|
|
|
|
Post by psychedamike24 on Jan 1, 2024 1:42:37 GMT -5
TIL Vancouver has received over 500 mm of precipitation in one month before. Happy 2024!
|
|
|
|
Post by desiccatedi85 on Jan 1, 2024 20:33:13 GMT -5
F, without the minus, because the cold intense rains are a saving grace.
|
|
