|
Post by knot on May 26, 2020 19:58:49 GMT -5
Alright alright. I did wrong. I shall hang my head in shame for the next 838 weeks. Good dog! Now go and fetch my mail. Woof, woof.
|
|
|
Post by 🖕🏿Mörön🖕🏿 on May 26, 2020 20:11:26 GMT -5
Alright alright. I did wrong. I shall hang my head in shame for the next 838 weeks. Good dog! Now go and fetch my mail. Woof, woof. Jajajajaja buddy I wouldn't go that far now. As for Ariete, I'll be watching you bror.
|
|
|
Post by Ariete on May 27, 2020 12:06:39 GMT -5
Sure. It's not that huge of a deal though...? You're being a bit of a shithead here Ariete. This isn't CD.
Most people here don't seem to have any problems with posting in the correct threads. It's just you.
|
|
|
Post by 🖕🏿Mörön🖕🏿 on Jun 17, 2020 18:53:38 GMT -5
Just randomly looked at this page but Novosibirsk has decreased in average annual temperature, with most months seeing decreases (1981-2010 vs the older and warmer 1961-1990 record)
|
|
|
Post by knot on Jun 17, 2020 19:06:43 GMT -5
^I've noticed a slight disparity with those tables:
The top table is sourced from Pogoda.ru.net, whereas its bottom counterpart is sourced from Roshydromet.
|
|
|
Post by 🖕🏿Mörön🖕🏿 on Jun 17, 2020 19:13:00 GMT -5
^I've noticed a slight disparity with those tables: The top table is sourced from Pogoda.ru.net, whereas its bottom counterpart is sourced from Roshydromet. Yeah Roshydromet is the state agency but pogoda.ru.net is pretty reputable.
|
|
|
Post by Donar on Aug 20, 2020 7:05:21 GMT -5
Top top 20 urban clusters by carbon footprint. Seoul is highest while the rich Arab cities are particularly bad per capita:
|
|
|
Post by nei on Aug 21, 2020 6:15:09 GMT -5
Top top 20 urban clusters by carbon footprint. Seoul is highest while the rich Arab cities are particularly bad per capita: I think it's plotting total carbon emissions which is kinda misleading (doesn't make sense for NYC to be twice Chicago). Dense large cities are usually low from less driving and in the core, shorter distances of travel + apartments in big buildings share wall so less heat required. Oh, the bubble size is per capita, got it.
|
|
|
Post by Ariete on Sept 10, 2020 9:17:30 GMT -5
Pic from Antarctica 103 years ago and this year:
|
|
|
Post by 🖕🏿Mörön🖕🏿 on Sept 10, 2020 10:29:33 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by nei on Sept 10, 2020 13:39:19 GMT -5
yea, they're ice shelves but no mountain glaciers. odd
|
|
|
Post by Ariete on Sept 10, 2020 13:50:33 GMT -5
Most of Antarctica has very low snowfall but constant high winds, so it's not uncommon to see mountaintops bare or with little snow.
The transantarctic mountains are not covered in snow, despite never going above freezing:
|
|
|
Post by 🖕🏿Mörön🖕🏿 on Sept 10, 2020 14:25:55 GMT -5
Most of Antarctica has very low snowfall but constant high winds, so it's not uncommon to see mountaintops bare or with little snow.
The transantarctic mountains are not covered in snow, despite never going above freezing:
I would hazard to say that the winds are largely responsible for movement of sea ice and ice shelves. I mean, that other pic the mountains look exactly the same. Just a hypothesis though.
|
|
|
Post by Ariete on Sept 10, 2020 15:23:56 GMT -5
I would hazard to say that the winds are largely responsible for movement of sea ice and ice shelves. I mean, that other pic the mountains look exactly the same. Just a hypothesis though.
But the mean wind speed hasn't changed in the Antarctic the last 100 years. Anyway, we are talking about tonnes and tonnes of ice, not powdery snow. Only gradual but constant warming can make those icebergs disappear.
|
|
|
Post by 🖕🏿Mörön🖕🏿 on Sept 21, 2020 15:08:19 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by knot on Sept 23, 2020 0:24:19 GMT -5
I don't have time to argue against your conspiracy theories, but surprisingly this forum actually does a better job at acknowledging that climate change is real and primarily caused by humans than the general US population: www.pewresearch.org/science/2016/10/04/public-views-on-climate-change-and-climate-scientists/So far we have 34/54 --> 63% vs. 48% for the general US population. It's amazing how ignorant the general population is. And I think the main reason why people would deny climate change is fear of the solutions against it: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Climate_change_denial#Responding_to_climate_denial_-_the_role_of_emotions_and_persuasive_argumentAnd now in 2020, we have people denying the existence of COVID-19 probably for the same reason: fear of masks and social distancing. I think another part of the reason why the denial still exists is that using logical persuasion to undermine denial is ineffective because denial of climate change is not based on logic; it's based on feelings. That is why this forum has dragged out so long. Adding onto that, what's even more ridiculous is denying specifically because of fear of the solutions, instead of just accepting that it's real and arguing for the position that it's not worth our effort to fix. Not that I agree with that position, but at least being straightforward about your view is better than straight up denying science. Throughout history science has shown to often be right when the public opinion is wrong. An example is tobacco. Science has shown that it's harmful to health earlier than the public became convinced. Now, I'll wait for the imaginary dislikes to flood in. It appears you've got the wrong thread. AGW politics go here: cdweather.boards.net/thread/2289/climate-activism-policy
|
|
|
Post by srfoskey on Sept 27, 2020 16:25:12 GMT -5
Interesting read, but he only talked about the fires in the PacNW and not CA. Also, in unrelated news, he got into trouble a couple months ago for comparing the riots in Seattle to Kristallnacht.
|
|
|
Post by srfoskey on Nov 1, 2020 3:57:44 GMT -5
Arctic sea ice extent is running about 800,000 km^2 below the second lowest extent on record. It's also 3,600,000 km^2 below the 1979-1990 mean extent.
|
|
|
Post by knot on Nov 13, 2020 2:58:15 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by 🖕🏿Mörön🖕🏿 on Nov 13, 2020 12:16:28 GMT -5
Already seeing the effects of it I would hazard. Also, this doesn't even take into account the continuing weakening of our planet's own magnetic field and the likely reversal, or at the very least the continued wandering, of its magnetic poles. It's gonna get cold, at the very least. Thank fuck they have that seed vault in Svalbard but it might not be of any use if it is buried under ice.
|
|