|
|
Post by kronan2 on Mar 8, 2024 17:04:17 GMT -5
this isn't a partisan issue. you can belive in climate change and stil hate gender-and social studies. i don't claim to stand against anything btw. being anti-something is not productive. it's cringe actually.
|
|
|
|
Post by Benfxmth on Mar 8, 2024 17:12:20 GMT -5
this isn't a partisan issue. you can belive in climate change and stil hate gender-and social studies. i don't claim to stand against anything btw. being anti-something is not productive. it's cringe actually. You're asking too much for massivesHIV though lol |
|
|
|
Post by Beercules on Mar 8, 2024 18:13:47 GMT -5
i feel that the so called "climate activists" are wasting time proving that climate change is a problem. most people know full well it's a problem. but our modern society and daily comfort depends on carbon-fuel, so there are no realistic solutions, nor will there ever be. shit will hit the fan within a few hundred years, people will die en masse, and then the climate will re-stabilaze again. you can't change human nature. Wtf kronan. I used to respect. You claim to stand against the elite yet you believe in climate change. Do you also believe in 1000 genders and race being a social construct? The climate is not changing and people will not die en masse. It’s all a myth created by the elites to distract us from the real issues. Believing in climate change is fine, (I only believe in climate change as a natural process of the Sun and Earth) what he is against is the destructive policies governments and elite the world over are imposing on the population to "combat" it, when the technology and know how is not there yet. And ofcourse there is the rampant destructive brainwashing, overblown nonsense "predictions", doomsaying etc, (bullshit like "climate crisis", fucken spare me). |
|
|
|
Post by massiveshibe on Mar 8, 2024 20:18:37 GMT -5
this isn't a partisan issue. you can belive in climate change and stil hate gender-and social studies. i don't claim to stand against anything btw. being anti-something is not productive. it's cringe actually. You’re still believing in something the elite wants you to believe. You don’t have to be against the elite or anything, just seeing through their lies is enough. However, falaely claiming that people will die en masse is a lie and something you shouldn’t do, it makes people panic about climate change. |
|
|
|
Post by massiveshibe on Mar 8, 2024 20:27:50 GMT -5
Wtf kronan. I used to respect. You claim to stand against the elite yet you believe in climate change. Do you also believe in 1000 genders and race being a social construct? The climate is not changing and people will not die en masse. It’s all a myth created by the elites to distract us from the real issues. Believing in climate change is fine, (I only believe in climate change as a natural process of the Sun and Earth) what he is against is the destructive policies governments and elite the world over are imposing on the population to "combat" it, when the technology and know how is not there yet. And ofcourse there is the rampant destructive brainwashing, overblown nonsense "predictions", doomsaying etc, (bullshit like "climate crisis", fucken spare me). I agree with you, especially on climate change being a natural process. The climate has changed several times, a few times the Earth was entirely covered in ice, and in others it had no ice caps. We are currently leaving a glacial period and going deeper into an interglacial, sunspot activity is also increasing and parts of the Earth are getting warmer, although the Earth in general is still cooler today that it was during the Early Holocene (the beginning of the current interglacial period). Give it a few thousand more years and we’ll return to an ice age, and yes, leftists will still worry about climate change. Worrying about climate change is like worrying about summer droughts in a California, or subfreezing temperatures in London, which is, worrying about natural things that happen all the time. |
|
|
|
Post by Benfxmth on Mar 8, 2024 20:32:21 GMT -5
i feel that the so called "climate activists" are wasting time proving that climate change is a problem. most people know full well it's a problem. but our modern society and daily comfort depends on carbon-fuel, so there are no realistic solutions, nor will there ever be. shit will hit the fan within a few hundred years, people will die en masse, and then the climate will re-stabilaze again. you can't change human nature. Wtf kronan. I used to respect. You claim to stand against the elite yet you believe in climate change. Do you also believe in 1000 genders and race being a social construct? The climate is not changing and people will not die en masse. It’s all a myth created by the elites to distract us from the real issues. ''Climate change is a hoax invented by China to deindustrialize the west'' God you flip flop your opinions even more than Angler did, god |
|
|
|
Post by massiveshibe on Mar 8, 2024 20:39:07 GMT -5
Wtf kronan. I used to respect. You claim to stand against the elite yet you believe in climate change. Do you also believe in 1000 genders and race being a social construct? The climate is not changing and people will not die en masse. It’s all a myth created by the elites to distract us from the real issues. ''Climate change is a hoax invented by China to deindustrialize the west'' God you flip flop your opinions even more than Angler did, god I don’t believe in climate change and I also don’t believe it was invented by China to deindustrialize the west. My opinions have not changed. My personal belief is that the WESTERN elite created it to distract us from the real issues, and certain conservative sects of the western elite push the false narrative that it was made up by China do deindustrialize the west, also a way to distract us from the issues we should worry about. |
|
|
|
Post by greysrigging on Mar 13, 2024 23:52:38 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Beercules on Mar 14, 2024 4:36:54 GMT -5
More nonsense AGW hyperbole peddled by paid shills that won't happen. That "article" is best printed off and kept as an emergency supply the next time we have a toilet paper shortage.
Remember Flim Flam Flannery's 2007 hyperbole:
"Even the rain that falls isn't actually going to fill our dams and river systems"
Well, I wonder how did that turn out now....
|
|
|
|
Post by Cheeseman on Mar 16, 2024 8:14:20 GMT -5
More nonsense AGW hyperbole peddled by paid shills that won't happen. That "article" is best printed off and kept as an emergency supply the next time we have a toilet paper shortage. Remember Flim Flam Flannery's 2007 hyperbole: "Even the rain that falls isn't actually going to fill our dams and river systems" Well, I wonder how did that turn out now.... I still remember circa the late 2000s when Al Gore claimed there would be no Arctic sea ice in the summer by 2013...as we all know, that never happened and the record for lowest ice coverage is over a decade old by now. |
|
|
|
Post by Benfxmth on Mar 16, 2024 19:42:53 GMT -5
More nonsense AGW hyperbole peddled by paid shills that won't happen. That "article" is best printed off and kept as an emergency supply the next time we have a toilet paper shortage. Remember Flim Flam Flannery's 2007 hyperbole: "Even the rain that falls isn't actually going to fill our dams and river systems" Well, I wonder how did that turn out now.... I still remember circa the late 2000s when Al Gore claimed there would be no Arctic sea ice in the summer by 2013...as we all know, that never happened and the record for lowest ice coverage is over a decade old by now. Al Gore is a politician, not a scientist Though yes, he did misinterpret studies and make that claim |
|
|
|
Post by desiccatedi85 on Mar 16, 2024 20:47:33 GMT -5
More nonsense AGW hyperbole peddled by paid shills that won't happen. That "article" is best printed off and kept as an emergency supply the next time we have a toilet paper shortage. Remember Flim Flam Flannery's 2007 hyperbole: "Even the rain that falls isn't actually going to fill our dams and river systems" Well, I wonder how did that turn out now.... I still remember circa the late 2000s when Al Gore claimed there would be no Arctic sea ice in the summer by 2013...as we all know, that never happened and the record for lowest ice coverage is over a decade old by now. I wish he had said that. Perhaps less sea ice up there would lead to less severe cold blasts in the US. |
|
|
|
Post by massiveshibe on Sept 1, 2024 14:22:23 GMT -5
During the late Carboniferous period, the average global temperature was 2 degrees lower than today, yet carbon dioxide levels were twice as high. Greenhouse gas my arse.
|
|
|
|
Post by Benfxmth on Sept 1, 2024 14:26:08 GMT -5
During the late Carboniferous period, the average global temperature was 2 degrees lower than today, yet carbon dioxide levels were twice as high. Greenhouse gas my arse. Obviously, you have no idea of how greenhouse gases work and the physics of it, though that's par for the course given your -69 IQ. 🖕 |
|
|
|
Post by Kaleetan on Sept 1, 2024 16:00:51 GMT -5
During the late Carboniferous period, the average global temperature was 2 degrees lower than today, yet carbon dioxide levels were twice as high. Greenhouse gas my arse. I am far from being a climate alarmist, but this was an astronomically stupid take. |
|
|
|
Post by massiveshibe on Sept 1, 2024 16:06:37 GMT -5
During the late Carboniferous period, the average global temperature was 2 degrees lower than today, yet carbon dioxide levels were twice as high. Greenhouse gas my arse. I am far from being a climate alarmist, but this was an astronomically stupid take. Bother to explain why? |
|
|
|
Post by Donar on Sept 1, 2024 16:33:19 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by massiveshibe on Sept 1, 2024 16:53:11 GMT -5
The faint young sun paradox is about Early Earth from 4 billion years ago when the sun was still young and forming. The Carboniferous period was 300 million years ago, the sun was already fully formed and no different than it is today. Now going back to the current Quartenary Glaciation, CO2 levels begin to decrease AFTER the start of a glacial period, not before. It's not the temperature that changes based on different CO2 levels, instead, it's CO2 levels that change with global temperatures. This happens mainly because CO2 solubility decreases as water temperature increases, so when oceans get warmer, they release CO2 into the atmosphere, and as the oceans cool down, they absorb CO2 from the atmosphere. Correlation does not equal causation. CO2 being higher during warmer periods in the past few million years doesn't mean it was the cause for the higher temperatures. |
|
|
|
Post by Benfxmth on Sept 1, 2024 16:56:28 GMT -5
The faint young sun paradox is about Early Earth from 4 billion years ago when the sun was still young and forming. The Carboniferous period was 300 million years ago, the sun was already fully formed and no different than it is today. Now going back to the current Quartenary Glaciation, CO2 levels begin to decrease AFTER the start of a glacial period, not before. It's not the temperature that changes based on different CO2 levels, instead, it's CO2 levels that change with global temperatures. This happens mainly because CO2 solubility decreases as water temperature increases, so when oceans get warmer, they release CO2 into the atmosphere, and as the oceans cool down, they absorb CO2 from the atmosphere. Correlation does not equal causation. CO2 being higher during warmer periods in the past few million years doesn't mean it was the cause for the higher temperatures. Can you provide a single shred of evidence that suggests that, that proves that CO2's molecular structure doesn't absorb infrared radiation, and thus doesn't absorb heat, and thus doesn't warm the planet and not pull shit out of your mongoloid ass? Oh yeah, you can't, you're just flat-out lying, if you're going to argue against well-known physics, at least get your facts straight. Put simply: |
|
|
|
Post by massiveshibe on Sept 1, 2024 17:11:45 GMT -5
The faint young sun paradox is about Early Earth from 4 billion years ago when the sun was still young and forming. The Carboniferous period was 300 million years ago, the sun was already fully formed and no different than it is today. Now going back to the current Quartenary Glaciation, CO2 levels begin to decrease AFTER the start of a glacial period, not before. It's not the temperature that changes based on different CO2 levels, instead, it's CO2 levels that change with global temperatures. This happens mainly because CO2 solubility decreases as water temperature increases, so when oceans get warmer, they release CO2 into the atmosphere, and as the oceans cool down, they absorb CO2 from the atmosphere. Correlation does not equal causation. CO2 being higher during warmer periods in the past few million years doesn't mean it was the cause for the higher temperatures. Can you provide a single shred of evidence that suggests that, that proves that CO2's molecular structure doesn't absorb infrared radiation, and thus doesn't absorb heat, and thus doesn't warm the planet and not pull shit out of your mongoloid ass? You can't I'm afraid. You're shifting the burden of proof. Alarmists like you are the ones who should prove CO2 is causing climate change, it's not up to skeptics to prove it's not. |
|
