Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 24, 2019 2:13:57 GMT -5
What do you think of Vostok Station when 60°C are added to all temperatures? It's a cold fucken desert with short hot summers and very long and cold winters. The long length of winter seems interesting. Note that because I decided to keep relative humidity the same, summers are fairly humid despite the low precipitation. For me it's an F. Winters are too cold, long, and dark. Only 4 months are non-wintry. Mid-summer is a bit too hot/humid. The long length of winter really drops the average annual temperature despite the hot summers. Plus, precipitation is far too low and scenery will probably be desert-like. But it's still waaaaay better than the real Vostok Station, of course.
|
|
|
Post by Lommaren on Mar 24, 2019 9:36:52 GMT -5
Not enough winter snow, too hot summers, but at least November and February should have some really good parts. The weak sun angle should help peak summer too.
E
|
|
|
Post by 🖕🏿Mörön🖕🏿 on Mar 24, 2019 11:08:09 GMT -5
D
Good temps but too fucken dry.
|
|
|
Post by alex992 on Mar 24, 2019 11:17:49 GMT -5
Lol, Vostok is still a pretty chilly climate even with 60 C added on.
That being said, a D-. Way too dry and peak cold months last too long.
|
|
|
Post by Crunch41 on Mar 24, 2019 11:23:11 GMT -5
D. Far too dry. Would be better with 10x precipitation and less extreme sun hours. 4 months of constant drops the grade. I don't mind the hot summer since it's short.
|
|
|
Post by Steelernation on Mar 24, 2019 12:42:16 GMT -5
D. Winter is way too long and there’s probably barely any snow or thunderstorms.
|
|
|
Post by Ariete on Mar 24, 2019 13:49:59 GMT -5
F- as in fucken minus. Unlivable.
|
|
|
Post by tij on Mar 24, 2019 13:53:29 GMT -5
E. No D/D- due to issues with polar night and lack of precip-- all winterms months are still milder than mpls in january....
|
|
|
Post by chesternz on Mar 28, 2019 9:02:30 GMT -5
This is my dream summer vacation spot. But as a place to live? E. Still better than wet, cold, depressing maritime subarctic climates though.
|
|
|
Post by jgtheone on Mar 28, 2019 9:27:33 GMT -5
E+, still freezing apart from nov-feb lol. Who gave this a B?
|
|
|
Post by Hlidskjalf on Mar 28, 2019 12:45:56 GMT -5
Vow, Even with 60c warmer Vostok still has long cold winters. If it was 80c warmer we would be talking, but then summers would be a bit too hot, (although short) even for my liking.
What a remarkable place and with such high amounts of sunshine.
|
|
|
Post by Morningrise on Apr 2, 2019 8:35:15 GMT -5
E. Weird climate. Summers are way too hot but also too short and the winter is just too long. Also that sunshine distribution is horrendous.
|
|
|
Post by Ethereal on Mar 9, 2022 6:52:23 GMT -5
Should've done 65C+ (or perhaps 70C) and even out the sunshine hours E+ for the relatively pleasant brief summers
|
|
|
Post by CRISPR on Dec 31, 2023 23:00:34 GMT -5
So a hotter Vostok would be a BWk climate, with Dxa temperatures. E, due the terrible daylight variability, lack of substantial precipitation and the extreme length of the winter. 2 months of summer, 2 month of autumn + spring and 8 months of winter is a little wrong, right? February and November look really nice temperature-wise, but with ridiculously long days and no rain. The short summer would be bad; while those long, dark winters made it lose marks IMO. I think it would be more interesting to increase the precipitation by 20-50 times in each month, or bombard the settlement with snow/rain.
|
|
|
Post by desiccatedi85 on Jan 1, 2024 8:36:42 GMT -5
E-, still bad. At least the hot, dry summer and lack of snow in winter are redeeming features, but still, only 4-6 months of decent weather and tons of depressing dry cold. This is still better than many subarctic shit holes though.
|
|
|
Post by cawfeefan on Jan 1, 2024 19:46:53 GMT -5
E. Winters are too long and cold, and summers are too hot though brief. Also, the sunshine hours would mess with me.
|
|