Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 10, 2019 21:28:31 GMT -5
Two very mild to cool climates here. Eureka, CA is cool year-round with wet winters while La Serena has a little bit more warmth but is a desert. Which one would you prefer? Humboldt County is well-named, I must say.    |
|
|
|
Post by Mörön on May 10, 2019 21:30:12 GMT -5
Pretty easy.
Eureka by far as it is cooler and wetter. The other is considerably more boring than an already boring climate (Eureka).
|
|
|
|
Post by Steelernation on May 10, 2019 21:30:23 GMT -5
La Serena for being warmer and drier.
|
|
|
|
Post by tij on May 10, 2019 21:41:45 GMT -5
I'm going with Eureka for rain and sun. I think La Serena has a bit better summers though, I really would prefer more heat than either so Eureka is a C since it gets rain and Serena is a C- since it doesn't but remains comfortable year round.
|
|
|
|
Post by Iwantsnow on May 10, 2019 23:15:22 GMT -5
Eureka for having rain. La Serena is just too dry.
|
|
|
|
Post by knot on May 11, 2019 0:12:42 GMT -5
Eureka, FUCKEN!
La Serena is extraordinarily GAY.
|
|
|
|
Post by Beercules on May 11, 2019 1:12:02 GMT -5
Both are fucking shit as far as temps are concerned, but Eureka clearly has the more variety, more chance of "weather", so to speak. So Eureka it is.
|
|
|
|
Post by Hiromant on May 11, 2019 12:03:00 GMT -5
I'll go for full comfort so La Serena. Eureka's rainy 9°C for half a year is awful, I get sick of that shit here in a month.
|
|
|
|
Post by Lommaren on May 11, 2019 12:19:39 GMT -5
La Serena for me purely based on the fact that it has a summer beyond an SMHI definition. 21/14 with tropical sun at sea level would be very comfortable indeed.
Eureka is not terrible, it's just narrowly worse than my climate. It has its charm too in that winter warmth briefly occurs like having January 1981 tied as the warmest monthly maximum that year and also recording its warmest ever night (17°C) in January that month, which is insane at its high latitude. All that aside, it begs the question, would I really accept 18/12 summers in the long run and no chance whatsoever of any warm overnight lows? At least La Serena while never getting hot, should have recorded some 20°C lows in its history, shoreline on the cold current or not. Of course, La Serena can be rather warm in winter as well, which is a welcome bonus for any maritime climate.
|
|
|
|
Post by omegaraptor on May 11, 2019 13:14:03 GMT -5
I'll take the one that has rain.
|
|
|
|
Post by flamingGalah on May 12, 2019 7:56:39 GMT -5
La Serena for being warmer
|
|
|
|
Post by chesternz on May 18, 2019 5:09:21 GMT -5
La Serena for being drier.
|
|
|
|
Post by jgtheone on May 19, 2019 9:10:27 GMT -5
Eureka. By far the better rain pattern (almost perfect), and more variety.
|
|
|
|
Post by Ethereal on Mar 9, 2022 0:44:42 GMT -5
Hard choice. Eureka is sunnier but it's under 20C all year round. I'll begrudgingly go with Serena
|
|
|
|
Post by CRISPR on Feb 25, 2024 2:20:40 GMT -5
La Serena I guess, for being warmer and having stronger sun
|
|
|
|
Post by cawfeefan on Feb 25, 2024 2:45:49 GMT -5
Eureka for more rain
La Serena's February record low looks really out of place
|
|
|
|
Post by Benfxmth on Sept 29, 2024 10:14:09 GMT -5
Both are F climates, but Eureka wins for more variety and sunshine here
|
|
|
|
Post by Cadeau on Sept 29, 2024 10:33:26 GMT -5
Eureka for not being an arid.
|
|
|
|
Post by Shaheen Hassan on Sept 29, 2024 15:56:50 GMT -5
La Serena has the better temps, but I have to choose Eureka for rainfall. La Serena is too dry.
|
|
|
|
Post by arcleo on Sept 29, 2024 16:14:48 GMT -5
Eureka. Rain has become more important than summer temps for me, even though both of these are too cool
|
|
Lived:
Residence:
