|
|
Post by omegaraptor on Jul 13, 2019 0:37:05 GMT -5
  Which of these two climates do you view as warmer than the other? Calculate the average annual mean, and the answer might surprise you as to which one is technically warmer...  Average annual mean can be a misleading statistic. |
|
|
|
Post by knot on Jul 13, 2019 0:43:03 GMT -5
YREKA
Yreka's midsummer average high is akin to Seattle's midsummer annal mean maximum...end of story!
"Annual Mean" is indeed a misleading, fraudulent tactic whereby Botev's take advantage of.
|
|
|
|
Post by 🖕🏿Mörön🖕🏿 on Jul 13, 2019 0:48:51 GMT -5
Bro Yrkea maded 44C while Seattle maded less than that. Therefor Seeatlea is colder than Yrkea. Yrkea is warmer than Seattlae,
|
|
|
|
Post by Crunch41 on Jul 13, 2019 12:55:06 GMT -5
Yreka has much hotter summers so it would feel warmer.
|
|
|
|
Post by Steelernation on Jul 13, 2019 18:29:45 GMT -5
Yreka. Highs are much warmer and summers are actually hot.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 14, 2019 2:10:47 GMT -5
Yreka is warmer due to warmer highs overall.
The mean is generally useful but other factors such as diurnal range and specific temps by month need to be considered. The means are very similar (only 0.4C difference) in this case so other factors take over.
|
|
|
|
Post by jgtheone on Jul 14, 2019 4:41:14 GMT -5
Well I know where I'd rather be.
|
|
|
|
Post by Morningrise on Jul 14, 2019 12:42:30 GMT -5
Yreka. To me, "warm" implies an active presence of warmth, which Yreka has plenty of in the summer months, rather than an absence of cold. By my standards Seattle is milder and Yreka is warmer.
|
|
|
|
Post by Donar on Jul 14, 2019 12:51:43 GMT -5
Yreka. Highs matter more.
|
|
Average annual mean can be a misleading statistic.
