|
|
Post by Lommaren on Dec 30, 2019 14:59:41 GMT -5
Puy de Dôme is an extinct volcano in the centre of France above warm maritime climates such as nearby city Clermont-Ferrand, whereas Røros is one of Norway's most continental climates, not far from the Swedish border in a valley in the middle of the mountain range. It's the only Norwegian town I've been to myself, in February 2004.
This is essentially temperature inversion vs frost hollow for all intents and purposes. Røros' extremes deviate a lot from the means, whereas Puy de Dôme at a mountain top didn't reach 28.5°C once for 35 years, but severe cold is unlikely. It's essentially a slightly warmer Tromsø with strong UV in the mid-latitudes. The elevation is 1,485 metres versus 625 metres for Røros.
My vote is for Puy de Dôme since Røros is a bit too severe in winter, with not enough summer warmth to turn it around.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 30, 2019 15:13:03 GMT -5
I will go with Røros for being more interesting, having a warmer record high, and being slightly drier, but both climates get F's from me.
|
|
|
|
Post by Steelernation on Dec 30, 2019 15:15:33 GMT -5
Røros for being more interesting.
|
|
|
|
Post by tij on Dec 30, 2019 15:22:34 GMT -5
Puy for being much milder in winter and at a lower, non-nordic latitude, and for not having tue potential for deep frosts. The records are not directly comparable though as time periods are quite different.
Similar avgs to Roros in southern Minnesota during the winter peak but the record lows there are creepy... and highs are significantly lower as well... failure of a variability pattern
|
|
|
|
Post by omegaraptor on Dec 30, 2019 16:33:38 GMT -5
Røros has about zero thunderstorm activity so I'll go with Puy de Dôme, based on a thunderstorm map of Europe I found the activity there doesn't actually seem bad at all. The latter also probably gets more snow.
Puy de Dôme also enters "spring" faster in contrast with Røros' everlasting cold. Røros has a warmer May but let's be real, neither of these climates are going to win based on shoulder seasons alone.
|
|
|
|
Post by knot on Dec 30, 2019 20:01:22 GMT -5
PUY DE DÔME
–50° C can get fucked.
|
|
|
|
Post by Lommaren on Dec 30, 2019 20:13:21 GMT -5
PUY DE DÔME–50° C can get fucked. Should shalop Base Camp to be put up in Røros? |
|
|
|
Post by Donar on Dec 31, 2019 3:32:49 GMT -5
Puy de Dome mostly for latitude and topographic position. Such an exposed location has possible sunshine hours above 100% (based on a flat surface), probably very nice sunsets observable there.
|
|
|
|
Post by shalop on Dec 31, 2019 4:18:01 GMT -5
Should shalop Base Camp to be put up in Røros? I don't understand the grammar in your rhetorical question... but yeah, Roros beats the living shit out of the other one. I'd give them A- and B-. |
|
|
|
Post by Lommaren on Dec 31, 2019 4:59:58 GMT -5
I don't understand the grammar in your rhetorical question... but yeah, Roros beats the living shit out of the other one. I'd give them A- and B-. Base Camp = high-elevation dwellings in the Himalayas known to prepare climbers for the extreme conditions! |
|
|
|
Post by knot on Dec 31, 2019 5:58:38 GMT -5
Base Camp = high-elevation dwellings in the Himalayas known to prepare climbers for the extreme conditions!  Shalop specifically stated that your grammar was piss-poor, not vocabulary. Indeed, it was: "Should shalop Base Camp to be put up in Røros?" <— That is kindergarten-tier grammar. Shame! |
|
|
|
Post by Cadeau on Dec 31, 2019 8:18:25 GMT -5
Let's see how you can complete a perfect Swedish grammar vice versa lol
I understand what he's trying to convey in that rhetorical question no matter of structure in the sentence and I'm not even a native English speaker.
Record low in Røros is cold enough to satisfy Shalop to build a base camp over there.
Anyways, I was little hesitated after reading omega's post about thunderstorm map... if Puy de Dôme receives more frequency than New England region of the US, I choose Røros. If not, Puy de Dôme.
|
|
|
|
Post by Lommaren on Dec 31, 2019 14:48:22 GMT -5
Shalop specifically stated that your grammar was piss-poor, not vocabulary. Indeed, it was: "Should shalop Base Camp to be put up in Røros?" <— That is kindergarten-tier grammar. Shame! Should Shalop's Base Camp be put up in Røros then.
I wrote too fast, I reckon, but trust me, I've a full house of top grades in all kinds of English courses throughout my school time!
It would be funny though if the new meme was "Schlommo maded atrociously grammars jajajaja"  |
|
|
|
Post by shalop on Dec 31, 2019 17:06:34 GMT -5
Should Shalop's Base Camp be put up in Røros then. Ah okay, thanks for clarification. Cadeau I didn't understand even that much, but my interpretation skills are not too good. |
|
|
|
Post by 🖕🏿Mörön🖕🏿 on Dec 31, 2019 17:38:11 GMT -5
I like Røros more. Better winters and less wet during the warmer months overall
|
|
|
|
Post by Crunch41 on Dec 31, 2019 21:20:02 GMT -5
Røros. If I'm stuck with an anemic summer, might as well have a solid winter. Both are too cold most of the year.
|
|
Lived:
Residence:
