|
|
Post by deneb78 on Apr 24, 2020 13:30:33 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Donar on Apr 24, 2020 13:32:50 GMT -5
Wuhan of course.
|
|
|
|
Post by Benfxmth on Apr 24, 2020 13:33:02 GMT -5
I would say that Wuhan is more continental because of larger thermal amplitude.
|
|
|
|
Post by tij on Apr 24, 2020 13:33:39 GMT -5
Wuhan in terms of continentality (which I believe is what you are referring to), but Tromsø in terms of retaining a snowpack or a Dxx classification.
|
|
|
|
Post by 🖕🏿Mörön🖕🏿 on Apr 24, 2020 13:34:41 GMT -5
Wuhan for sure.
It has some impressively cold record lows.
Summer record highs aren't as extreme by comparison though.
25C in January and 29C in Feb are pretty extreme as well.
|
|
|
|
Post by deneb78 on Apr 24, 2020 13:35:47 GMT -5
Yeah Tromsø meets Köppen's definition of a continental climate with a snowpack but Wuhan does not despite double the thermal amplitude. That's what makes it interesting.
|
|
|
|
Post by Speagles84 on Apr 24, 2020 13:36:59 GMT -5
Wuhan in the sense of higher amplitude between their "winter" and summer, but Tromso is actually a continental climate with less seasonal amplitude. Fair question.
|
|
|
|
Post by Steelernation on Apr 24, 2020 14:26:49 GMT -5
Wuhan. Chilly winters, hot summers. Tromso is an oceanic climate that’s cool to cold year round.
|
|
|
|
Post by alex992 on Apr 24, 2020 14:28:18 GMT -5
Wuhan likely has a much higher continentality index (takes latitude into consideration), Tromso's amplitude for 70 degrees north is very very low. So I go with Wuhan. Tromso is essentially just a high latitude oceanic climate.
|
|
|
|
Post by knot on Apr 24, 2020 16:46:34 GMT -5
Wuhan, and it's not even close.
|
|
|
|
Post by omegaraptor on Apr 24, 2020 17:07:51 GMT -5
Tromsø is a polar oceanic climate. Wuhan is a subtropical continental climate.
Clearly Wuhan.
|
|
|
|
Post by AJ1013 on Apr 24, 2020 17:11:40 GMT -5
The answer is obviously Tucson
|
|
