|
|
Post by deneb78 on Feb 5, 2021 14:18:55 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by alex992 on Feb 5, 2021 14:21:22 GMT -5
Norilsk; less seasonal lag and more precipitation. Winters there look really snowy.
|
|
|
|
Post by ππΏMΓΆrΓΆnππΏ on Feb 5, 2021 14:22:02 GMT -5
Norilsk is much better. More snow, less cold winters, better summers.
|
|
|
|
Post by Kaleetan on Feb 5, 2021 14:23:24 GMT -5
I'll go with NOrilsk because it's a little warmer year-round, but both of these are complete crap.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 5, 2021 14:26:42 GMT -5
I was going to vote for Norilsk but then I noticed its craptastic record high on the wrong side of 90'F, so I'll just go with the "they both are climatic shitholes" option.
Edit: LOL at the Wikipedia page for Baker Lake: "[summer] can be hot and sometimes humid..."
|
|
|
|
Post by Speagles84 on Feb 5, 2021 15:04:26 GMT -5
Norilsk, but fuck - its even far too cold for me.
|
|
|
|
Post by Benfxmth on Feb 5, 2021 15:35:30 GMT -5
I'll go with Norilsk Baker Lake, but both climates are horror shows.
Edit: I changed my vote for Baker Lake for being slightly sunnier, and the warmer record highs
|
|
|
|
Post by Steelernation on Feb 5, 2021 16:52:02 GMT -5
Norilsk for being less frigid, abysmal climate still.
|
|
|
|
Post by Ariete on Feb 5, 2021 16:58:54 GMT -5
Both are just too cold and unlivable that I can't really choose.
|
|
|
|
Post by Morningrise on Feb 5, 2021 23:02:46 GMT -5
Norilsk for being slightly warmer, but they're both truly terrible.
|
|
|
|
Post by chesternz on Feb 6, 2021 10:16:03 GMT -5
Not much between them. I'll pick Baker Lake for being slightly sunnier and having a slightly higher record high.
|
|
|
|
Post by Cadeau on Feb 6, 2021 21:14:38 GMT -5
Norilsk, no contest. Donβt understand the purpose of this poll... trying to make Norilsk any better?
|
|
Lived:
Residence: