|
|
Post by trolik on Feb 24, 2021 13:24:17 GMT -5
Good old fashioned Cold War climate battle. What do you pick? Note that Tuapse could be marginally warmer as they're averages go back to 1955 but it shouldn't make too much difference.   |
|
|
|
Post by tommyFL on Feb 24, 2021 13:31:39 GMT -5
Tuapse for the cooler summers
|
|
|
|
Post by alex992 on Feb 24, 2021 14:04:40 GMT -5
Oklahoma City for being more continental and more interesting in general.
|
|
|
|
Post by Steelernation on Feb 24, 2021 14:07:43 GMT -5
OKC for being more continental, variable and having a much better precipitation pattern.
|
|
|
|
Post by Benfxmth on Feb 24, 2021 18:37:06 GMT -5
OKC for the warmer summers, and generally being more interesting.
|
|
|
|
Post by jgtheone on Feb 25, 2021 5:14:33 GMT -5
Tuapse has the better precip pattern, even if the summers are cooler.
Also 89mm of rain with 4 precip days lmao, must be some strong storms
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 25, 2021 7:59:10 GMT -5
Tuapse is a lot better than most Russian climates, and certainly better than what most people think of when they hear Russia. As much as I do like it, I have to give it to Oklahoma City - warmer most of the year and more exciting with all the big temperature swings and the severe storm potential Oklahoma is known for - and the much better record highs. Tuapse has the better precip pattern, even if the summers are cooler. Also 89mm of rain with 4 precip days lmao, must be some strong storms I'll agree with all of this. 89mm of rain with 4 precip days sounds like my dream climate!  |
|
|
|
Post by Cadeau on Feb 25, 2021 14:06:01 GMT -5
Tuapse for better summer, easy choice.
|
|
|
|
Post by ππΏMΓΆrΓΆnππΏ on Feb 26, 2021 0:04:37 GMT -5
Good battle.
I chose OKC but by a hair.
|
|
|
|
Post by srfoskey on Feb 26, 2021 15:34:50 GMT -5
Oklahoma City.
Tuapse has terrible winters for Russia.
|
|
|
|
Post by deneb78 on Feb 26, 2021 18:46:26 GMT -5
Tuapse for less variable winters and a higher hardiness zone.
|
|
Lived:
Residence:
