Climate Type Battle: Subarctic vs Subpolar Oceanic

I thought I'd do something a little different and pit two general climate types against each other. Today we're facing off between the classic subarctic climate, and the subpolar oceanic climate. I'm particularly interested in seeing how the cold haters/heat lovers will vote on this one.


Subarctic climates typically feature long and extremely cold winters and short mild summers that can occasionally experience serious heat. They tend to be on the drier side and usually have a summer precipitation peak. Some examples include:

Fairbanks
Whitehorse
Rovaniemi
Kiruna
Murmansk


Subpolar oceanic climates are typically fairly wet, being variants of oceanic climates, with winters that are pretty close to the freezing mark and cool/chilly summers that have average highs struggling to reach the mid-teens Celsius. They also tend to be on the cloudy side, some of them extremely so. Some examples include:

Reykjavik
Tórshavn
Punta Arenas
Unalaska
Puerto Williams


So what do you prefer?

Personally, I think I'm gonna go with subarctic climates. Even though they're far too cold for me in the winter at least they tend to be drier and can have decent summers that would give a break from the cold. The perpetual wet chill of subpolar oceanic climates is not my thing at all.