|
|
Post by FrozenI69 on Jul 19, 2021 10:03:49 GMT -5
An alpine tundra climate that's the highest settlement in the world. How would you rate the climate :  I'm giving it a D. Winter like year round. |
|
|
|
Post by alex992 on Jul 19, 2021 10:16:49 GMT -5
An E for misspelling the name.
|
|
|
|
Post by ๐๐ฟMรถrรถn๐๐ฟ on Jul 19, 2021 10:25:21 GMT -5
F for missing the E option.
|
|
|
|
Post by desiccatedi85 on Jul 19, 2021 10:31:32 GMT -5
F. Would either die by hypothermia, suicide, or altitude sickness. No thanks.
|
|
|
|
Post by Steelernation on Jul 19, 2021 11:17:12 GMT -5
F
|
|
|
|
Post by tommyFL on Jul 19, 2021 12:32:59 GMT -5
F for fake data
|
|
|
|
Post by Shaheen Hassan on Jul 19, 2021 16:19:58 GMT -5
Why do you think the data is fake? |
|
|
|
Post by Shaheen Hassan on Jul 19, 2021 16:20:21 GMT -5
F for being too cold year-round.
|
|
|
|
Post by knot on Jul 19, 2021 16:23:09 GMT -5
Why do you think the data is fake? Because the "source" is Climate-Data.org |
|
|
|
Post by Beercules on Jul 19, 2021 16:24:33 GMT -5
Unlivable heap of shit
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 19, 2021 16:25:02 GMT -5
F for "Freaking hell-hole."
|
|
|
|
Post by Shaheen Hassan on Jul 19, 2021 16:28:03 GMT -5
Why do you think the data is fake? Because the "source" is Climate-Data.org Not all data that have Climate-data.org as their source is inaccurate. Climate-data.org was mostly accurate except for some places. With the new update it's very inaccurate though. The data for La Rinconada is from the older version. |
|
|
|
Post by knot on Jul 19, 2021 16:34:03 GMT -5
Not all data that have Climate-data.org as their source is inaccurate. Climate-data.org was mostly accurate except for some places. With the new update it's very inaccurate though. The data for La Rinconada is from the older version. Akshually even the older version was extremely inaccurateโthe difference from the official data was extraordinary. It's just even more fake now. |
|
|
|
Post by Shaheen Hassan on Jul 19, 2021 16:39:54 GMT -5
Not all data that have Climate-data.org as their source is inaccurate. Climate-data.org was mostly accurate except for some places. With the new update it's very inaccurate though. The data for La Rinconada is from the older version. Akshually even the older version was extremely inaccurateโthe difference from the official data was extraordinary. It's just even more fake now. When I saw the data for tropical, subtropical and polar places it was mostly accurate. For temperate regions it was not very accurate for many places. Now all data is not accurate. |
|
|
|
Post by tommyFL on Jul 19, 2021 17:01:03 GMT -5
Because the "source" is Climate-Data.org Not all data that have Climate-data.org as their source is inaccurate. Climate-data.org was mostly accurate except for some places. With the new update it's very inaccurate though. The data for La Rinconada is from the older version. Totally irrelevant. It could be exactly the same as the real data, just by dumb luck, and would still be 100% fake just because of the methodology of the source. And what is that methodology, you might ask? Well..."All of our climate data are based on ECMWF Data". So there you go, non-measured data = fake data. Also, for the record, the nearest SENAMHI station is Ananea (4660 m), a good 300-400 m lower than La Rinconada. Any other data that claims to be from La Rinconada is fake as well. |
|
|
|
Post by Ariete on Jul 19, 2021 17:15:28 GMT -5
Looked up some of the Finnish locales there, and they were all fake as fuck.
|
|
|
|
Post by deneb78 on Jul 20, 2021 1:01:31 GMT -5
Any place that can't grow trees is going to get an automatic F.
|
|
|
|
Post by Ethereal on Jul 20, 2021 8:42:28 GMT -5
Naturally this would be an F, but E for not being terribly wet and perhaps being decently sunny.
|
|
|
|
Post by Cadeau on Jul 23, 2021 11:56:32 GMT -5
E-. (Voted on F)
|
|
|
|
Post by CRISPR on Mar 27, 2024 4:41:51 GMT -5
H for hypoxia
|
|
Lived:
Residence:
