|
Post by psychedamike24 on Mar 5, 2022 23:17:26 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by tommyFL on Mar 5, 2022 23:39:41 GMT -5
Interesting that a higher wet bulb temp could be endured in humid conditions vs dry conditions. I always knew humid heat was more tolerable, glad that someone finally did the research to show it.
|
|
|
Post by desiccatedi85 on Mar 6, 2022 0:15:39 GMT -5
Interesting that a higher wet bulb temp could be endured in humid conditions vs dry conditions. I always knew humid heat was more tolerable, glad that someone finally did the research to show it. Except that humid heat has cooler air temperatures than dry heat. The study never said that it controlled for actual air temperature, so of course the critical wetbulb threshold is going to be lower in dry places, because those dry places have hotter actual temperatures. Humid zones, on the other hand, get cooler actual temperatures, so there is a higher comfort threshold for wetbulb.
|
|
|
Post by tommyFL on Mar 6, 2022 0:58:44 GMT -5
Interesting that a higher wet bulb temp could be endured in humid conditions vs dry conditions. I always knew humid heat was more tolerable, glad that someone finally did the research to show it. Except that humid heat has cooler air temperatures than dry heat. The study never said that it controlled for actual air temperature, so of course the critical wetbulb threshold is going to be lower in dry places, because those dry places have hotter actual temperatures. Humid zones, on the other hand, get cooler actual temperatures, so there is a higher comfort threshold for wetbulb. Did you actually read the study?
|
|
|
Post by nei on Mar 6, 2022 1:07:02 GMT -5
If the wet bulb temperature threshold changes in dry vs humid heat, doesn’t seem that useful to use wet bulb here. Thought the idea is wet bulb itself determines what’s deadly
|
|
|
Post by psychedamike24 on Mar 8, 2022 2:12:08 GMT -5
If the wet bulb temperature threshold changes in dry vs humid heat, doesn’t seem that useful to use wet bulb here. Thought the idea is wet bulb itself determines what’s deadly Maybe the participants weren't given enough water or much water in the dry heat trials?
|
|
|
Post by Crunch41 on Mar 20, 2022 14:32:49 GMT -5
The article doesn't say anything about giving water. Drinking water would allow you to stand hotter temps. Being in the sun or doing heavy labor would make you overheat sooner. Also, these people probably lived in Pennsylvania, so they aren't as used to extreme heat as someone from Dubai.
These wet bulb temps (25-28 or 30-31C) have happened before and it doesn't kill everyone, but heat does kill people each year. Even in northern climates that don't get hot for long.
|
|
|
Post by Babu on Mar 21, 2022 9:39:32 GMT -5
I'm pretty sure the salty sweat produced from our bodies evaporate at a slower pace than regular water. This could help explain why the critical wet bulb temperature would be different in hot/dry vs warm/humid weather. Maybe a "sweat bulb temperature" would cancel out the disparity.
|
|
|
Post by psychedamike24 on Oct 9, 2023 23:50:02 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by greysrigging on Oct 10, 2023 2:14:11 GMT -5
My son was working 1.8klm underground as a Nipper at a gold mine in the Tanami Desert, Northern Territory, AU ( Newmont Australia ) He says they work in 30c Wet Bulb, but at 32c Wet Bulb they shut it down... simply too oppressive doing physical labour....
|
|
|
Post by psychedamike24 on Feb 20, 2024 3:10:15 GMT -5
PBS made a video citing the researchers from this study (I think?)
|
|