|
|
Post by Nidaros on Nov 4, 2017 14:08:20 GMT -5
More about October in Norway. For the country as a whole, temperatures were 1C above normal (61-90). The two northernmost provinces set new all-time heat records for Oct. Warmest high in Oct was 21.5C at Nuvsvåg near Hammerfest. The month was very wet in the southernmost part (>200 - 250 %), and much drier in the northernmost part, where some stations only recorded ca 50 % of normal precip. For the country as a whole, precip was 115 %. Wettest: 682.5 mm at Gullfjellet (345 m, Bergen municipality). Driest: 11.3 mm (28 %) at Polmak near Kirkenes. Warmest station was Lindesnes with 24-hr mean 11C. Coldest was high mountain stations, with -3.4C at Juvasshøe (1894 m). Having a look at the wet area...  South coast E of Kristiansand  |
|
|
|
Post by Lommaren on Nov 4, 2017 14:35:38 GMT -5
Whats up with sun hours in Oslo in september? I remember the weather was quite normal, but not that bad. And there were far more rainy days in july than 4, thats for sure. According to yr it was 98,2 mm of precipitation in july. South-Central Scandinavia had very low diurnals in September as a result of intense low-pressure systems that kept absolute temps and averages in check. Even here on the east coast of Sweden, October was actually two hours sunnier in September (Norrköping's station) so although weird, it was definitely representative for the greater geographic region  |
|
|
|
Post by longaotian on Nov 4, 2017 16:39:05 GMT -5
******* we just had our cloudiest October on record - 129 hours  |
|
|
|
Post by AJ1013 on Nov 5, 2017 11:00:02 GMT -5
Synopsis: Was consistently above average and summer-like until a sharp cold snap starting on Oct 26th brought fall-like temps and the second coldest October max temperature ever. Highest temp: 88F Average High: 83.6F (-0.8F) Mean Temp: 78.5F (-0.4F) Average Low: 73.4F (0.0F) Lowest temp: 56F Min Max: 69F Max Min: 80F  |
|
|
|
Post by Wildcat on Nov 6, 2017 9:52:47 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Lommaren on Nov 11, 2017 14:33:04 GMT -5
San Francisco 2017 so far:  |
|
|
|
Post by alex992 on Nov 12, 2017 22:21:38 GMT -5
SF's climate makes South FL look interesting.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 13, 2017 9:35:35 GMT -5
SF is a weird climate.
|
|
|
|
Post by Lommaren on Nov 13, 2017 9:40:20 GMT -5
Pretty much a record-warm month in September and even that failed to cross the 20°C line  That's a line that pretty much any maritime station in my region has crossed several times, being coastal and 21° more northerly. To cap it off, in 2014 that even happened near Baba! |
|
|
|
Post by Beercules on Nov 13, 2017 9:43:27 GMT -5
I think suicide is a viable alternative to living in SF. Those summers, plus no thunderstorms. to be fair though, much hotter climates are only a day trip away. But if I was confined to SF for life, I would actually prefer Seattle, warmer summers and more chance of storms!!! Infact, I would probably pick London over SF aswell, warmer summers and better chance of storms! And it's not like SF's winters are anything to cream over. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 13, 2017 9:50:33 GMT -5
Pretty much a record-warm month in September and even that failed to cross the 20°C line That's a line that pretty much any maritime station in my region has crossed several times, being coastal and 21° more northerly. To cap it off, in 2014 that even happened near Baba! But nowhere in Sweden could have a September with an average high of 24.2C with high sunshine, and a record high of 38.3C |
|
|
|
Post by Lommaren on Nov 13, 2017 9:52:12 GMT -5
But nowhere in Sweden could have a September with an average high of 24.2C with high sunshine, and a record high of 38.3C No, abso-friggin'-lutely not. That record high would be impossible even in Paris or Frankfurt I think, although either can maybe get close to that avg high? |
|
|
|
Post by Lommaren on Nov 13, 2017 9:54:03 GMT -5
I think suicide is a viable alternative to living in SF. Those summers, plus no thunderstorms. to be fair though, much hotter climates are only a day trip away. But if I was confined to SF for life, I would actually prefer Seattle, warmer summers and more chance of storms!!! Infact, I would probably pick London over SF aswell, warmer summers and better chance of storms! And it's not like SF's winters are anything to cream over. What about San Jose? That should be as close to a Beerman-approved No Cal coastal* climate there is? * has an inlet of the South Bay right beside it  |
|
|
|
Post by Beercules on Nov 13, 2017 10:00:00 GMT -5
I think suicide is a viable alternative to living in SF. Those summers, plus no thunderstorms. to be fair though, much hotter climates are only a day trip away. But if I was confined to SF for life, I would actually prefer Seattle, warmer summers and more chance of storms!!! Infact, I would probably pick London over SF aswell, warmer summers and better chance of storms! And it's not like SF's winters are anything to cream over. What about San Jose? That should be as close to a Beerman-approved No Cal coastal* climate there is? * has an inlet of the South Bay right beside it Post its climate box then we'll talk. |
|
|
|
Post by Lommaren on Nov 13, 2017 10:42:56 GMT -5
Post its climate box then we'll talk. Okay here you go Beerman  |
|
|
|
Post by Beercules on Nov 13, 2017 10:54:14 GMT -5
A massive improvement over San Francisco, but still doesn't have thunderstorms (and the record lows are too low, and the summer lows could use a good 5-10C boost.) Still, less than an hour drive from SF, and probably cheaper property, why would anyone actually live in SF?!
|
|
|
|
Post by alex992 on Nov 13, 2017 11:50:03 GMT -5
I don't see how SF could appeal to any weather enthusiast. There's really very little there in terms of cold weather, hot weather, storms, snow, has a ridiculous seasonal lag in the summer. The only thing of interest is the occasional heat spike but that's about it. It's like a less comfortable Lima.
|
|
|
|
Post by Lommaren on Nov 13, 2017 13:18:33 GMT -5
Strong warmth rebound at La Laguna's airport in Northern Tenerife at 632 m asl.  |
|
|
|
Post by longaotian on Nov 14, 2017 6:16:04 GMT -5
I think suicide is a viable alternative to living in SF. Those summers, plus no thunderstorms. to be fair though, much hotter climates are only a day trip away. But if I was confined to SF for life, I would actually prefer Seattle, warmer summers and more chance of storms!!! Infact, I would probably pick London over SF aswell, warmer summers and better chance of storms! And it's not like SF's winters are anything to cream over. Would you pick Auckland over SF? Big storm here today, 600 lightning strikes over my house.  |
|
|
|
Post by Beercules on Nov 14, 2017 6:18:57 GMT -5
I would. Warmer year round and more storms. Still no fuckign storms here this spring, I swer every FUCKEN square inch of this country has seen lightning except here  There were big storms all over western SA yesterday, now that it's reach here, has flattened into gay ass rain areas |
|
That's a line that pretty much any maritime station in my region has crossed several times, being coastal and 21° more northerly. To cap it off, in 2014 that even happened near Baba!
