|
|
Post by cawfeefan on Jun 8, 2023 6:17:18 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by firebird1988 on Jun 8, 2023 7:01:58 GMT -5
I guess Tristan De Cunha, for warmer winters
|
|
|
|
Post by MET on Jun 8, 2023 7:21:18 GMT -5
Tristan de Cuna.
|
|
|
|
Post by tommyFL on Jun 8, 2023 7:25:52 GMT -5
Tristan da Cunha, better in every way
|
|
|
|
Post by Benfxmth on Jun 8, 2023 7:34:36 GMT -5
It's a choice between jumping off a cliff and poisoning oneself, but Tristan da Cunha for warmer averages and more sunshine (it's also at a lower latitude, which is a good thing mind you).
|
|
|
|
Post by desiccatedi85 on Jun 8, 2023 8:49:53 GMT -5
Tristan da Cunha for being warmer and getting heavy winter rains.
|
|
|
|
Post by Steelernation on Jun 8, 2023 9:54:10 GMT -5
Scotland is far better
|
|
|
|
Post by fairweatherfan on Jun 9, 2023 15:44:36 GMT -5
Tristan da Cunha for being warmer, and being able to grow things year round
|
|
|
|
Post by cawfeefan on Jun 10, 2023 5:46:42 GMT -5
Tristan da Cunha for being warmer, even though it's very boring
|
|
|
|
Post by ๐๐ฟMรถrรถn๐๐ฟ on Jun 10, 2023 7:23:56 GMT -5
Seeing as how Tristan's record high is a pathetic 24.4C and the high number of rain days, I'll go with Scotland.
Heat wankers are really just comfort wankers in disguise.
With that said, I really don't like the Scottish climate at all and I'd almost choose Tristan.
|
|
|
|
Post by Cheeseman on Jun 10, 2023 8:26:41 GMT -5
Tristan da Cunha
Both climates are ass, but this one is "warmer" year-round.
|
|
|
|
Post by caspase8 on Jun 10, 2023 21:01:48 GMT -5
The Scottish one. Tristan da Cunha has virtually no temperature variability and the shitty mild conditions would get old very quickly.
|
|
|
|
Post by srfoskey on Jun 11, 2023 16:54:19 GMT -5
Scotland for greater seasonality (and not even being that much cloudier).
|
|
|
|
Post by CRISPR on Jan 1, 2024 16:08:12 GMT -5
Tristan da Cunha for having cool, not cold rain and requiring less clothing (throughout the year).
|
|
