|
|
Post by massiveshibe on Jan 16, 2024 17:11:42 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by tommyFL on Jan 16, 2024 17:18:17 GMT -5
Neither, because the data for both is fake.
|
|
|
|
Post by desiccatedi85 on Jan 16, 2024 18:16:47 GMT -5
The data aren’t reliable sources, but Blanco wins for the perfect temps and moderate rainfall levels. It’s gotta be similar to Austin and San Antonio.
|
|
|
|
Post by Steelernation on Jan 16, 2024 18:20:58 GMT -5
Blanco
|
|
|
|
Post by tommyFL on Jan 16, 2024 18:31:03 GMT -5
Posting actual data here for Blanco at least (Bacolod doesn't have normals computed by PAGASA). Note the faked annual average high/low in the original weatherbox.  I vote Blanco. |
|
|
|
Post by Benfxmth on Jan 16, 2024 19:11:32 GMT -5
Blanco
|
|
|
|
Post by Met.Data on Jan 16, 2024 19:28:27 GMT -5
Both =  |
|
|
|
Post by CRISPR on Jan 16, 2024 20:46:51 GMT -5
Easily Blanco for the good shoulder seasons IMO
|
|
|
|
Post by desiccatedi85 on Jan 16, 2024 21:11:08 GMT -5
Still going with Blanco based on the true weatherbox, this one has even drier summers which is nice.
|
|
|
|
Post by Cheeseman on Jan 16, 2024 22:16:28 GMT -5
It's a toss-up, so I'll go with Negros to be contrarian.
|
|
|
|
Post by Kaleetan on Jan 17, 2024 10:25:33 GMT -5
Negros based on the data presented, and probably with actual data too - Filipino climates tend to be really nice.
|
|
|
|
Post by Marcelo on Jan 17, 2024 10:59:40 GMT -5
A city in Negros Island which actual and updated climate data is Dumaguete. Anyway, I prefer Blanco, Texas.
|
|
|
|
Post by tompas on Jan 17, 2024 15:16:27 GMT -5
Blanco,TX
|
|
