|
|
Post by Benfxmth on Apr 14, 2024 11:56:33 GMT -5
  Chicago for me easily. The milder winters in London aren't worth the fuckload more sunshine, warmer summers and more storms Chicago gets. |
|
|
|
Post by tompas on Apr 14, 2024 12:00:29 GMT -5
Chicago easy
|
|
|
|
Post by B87 on Apr 14, 2024 12:18:02 GMT -5
London easily. Warmer, drier and not frozen for months on end.
|
|
|
|
Post by MET on Apr 14, 2024 12:23:37 GMT -5
London obviously!
|
|
|
|
Post by desiccatedi85 on Apr 14, 2024 13:17:07 GMT -5
London easily. Chicago literally has average highs below freezing in midwinter. That means an ugly ass snowpack will sustain. London has far better winter/spring/fall temps, and it's much drier than Chicago in summer too, another bonus.
|
|
|
|
Post by Steelernation on Apr 14, 2024 13:19:34 GMT -5
London, too many shitty months in Chicago
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 14, 2024 14:48:27 GMT -5
London for being more temperate and pretty dry.
As a med wanker, I'd prefer evenly distributed precip over a summer wet/winter dry pattern.
|
|
|
|
Post by jetshnl on Apr 14, 2024 14:53:11 GMT -5
London easily
|
|
|
|
Post by CRISPR on Apr 14, 2024 14:58:41 GMT -5
Chicago thanks to April-October
|
|
|
|
Post by fairweatherfan on Apr 14, 2024 15:02:29 GMT -5
Chicago is literally called the Windy City. That, combined with the freezing winters would make the weather very unpleasant. Therefore, I choose London.
|
|
|
|
Post by arcleo on Apr 14, 2024 15:46:13 GMT -5
It's virtually a tie. I'll vote Chicago because it's more interesting and different from what I'm used to, but I'm not sure how annoying the snow/ice would be.
|
|
|
|
Post by Cadeau on Apr 14, 2024 16:36:39 GMT -5
You know what I’m gonna say. Obvious.
|
|
|
|
Post by ilmc90 on Apr 14, 2024 18:22:27 GMT -5
London. Not a fan of the Midwest's cold and dry winters.
|
|
|
|
Post by tommyFL on Apr 14, 2024 18:25:23 GMT -5
London I guess. Pretty shit and cloudy, but it's not like Chicago has bountiful sunshine in winter either. Plus Chicago is cold as fuck.
|
|
|
|
Post by Ethereal on Apr 15, 2024 4:03:37 GMT -5
Two of the worst (big city) climates pitted against each other. I'd rather be shot. Lol
|
|
|
|
Post by massiveshibe on Apr 15, 2024 8:04:11 GMT -5
Tough one. Chicago’s summers are too hot, but London’s winters are miserable 0C to 10C and overcast almost every day.
|
|
|
|
Post by giannini10 on Apr 15, 2024 14:31:23 GMT -5
London easily. Warmer, drier and not frozen for months on end. No one would describe London as “warmer” lmao |
|
|
|
Post by giannini10 on Apr 15, 2024 14:32:01 GMT -5
London easily. Chicago literally has average highs below freezing in midwinter. That means an ugly ass snowpack will sustain. London has far better winter/spring/fall temps, and it's much drier than Chicago in summer too, another bonus. London is darker and wetter in the summer, it just doesn’t get downpours. Why are you lying? |
|
|
|
Post by Benfxmth on Apr 15, 2024 14:33:05 GMT -5
London easily. Warmer, drier and not frozen for months on end. No one would describe London as “warmer” lmao London has a higher annual mean temp than Chicago. |
|
|
|
Post by giannini10 on Apr 15, 2024 14:33:59 GMT -5
It's virtually a tie. I'll vote Chicago because it's more interesting and different from what I'm used to, but I'm not sure how annoying the snow/ice would be. It’s really insane how much people start over-playing the cold the minute there’s any discussion of a non-oceanic/med climate on “cd weather board”. Inhabited by Australians with no perspective. If these people think Chicago is bad, what would they say about Moscow or Thunder Bay or Yulin, Shaanxi? |
|
Lived:
Residence:
