|
Post by Lommaren on Jan 5, 2018 13:28:07 GMT -5
I sense this one may get as close as Kentville vs Minneapolis. Two very different climates, but both are at relative distances from oceans and therefore have substantial seasonal swings within their own paradigms. My vote is obviously for Metz since it's milder in summer and winter. I'd fancy it to have 500 more hours of sunshine, but then again using French measurement methods Omaha would've probably just had somewhere in the 2400's anyway. Also, it's winter lows are bone-chilling and summers would be humid and influenced by tornadoes. Not very fun. Metz B- and Omaha D- for me.
|
|
|
Post by Steelernation on Jan 5, 2018 14:02:10 GMT -5
Omaha by far. More continental, more variable, dryer winters.
Its a B- vs. a C-
|
|
|
Post by knot on Jan 5, 2018 14:54:35 GMT -5
Omaha, but not easily. It is far more exciting than Metz, but those 19Β° C lows would bugger me sideways and fuck me dead..
|
|
|
Post by alex992 on Jan 5, 2018 15:20:18 GMT -5
Omaha, Nebraska. Far too sunny for me (about 800 hours too much) but much more continental, warmer summers and a much more interesting climate overall. A no-brainer as far as I'm concerned.
|
|
|
Post by Cadeau on Jan 5, 2018 15:29:43 GMT -5
Metz, no contest.
|
|
|
Post by jgtheone on Jan 6, 2018 2:55:48 GMT -5
Went for Metz, I don't like Omaha's winters at all even though their summers are better.
|
|
|
Post by Beercules on Jan 6, 2018 3:42:23 GMT -5
Omaha. Far more variety and excitement. I'll take the colder sunnier winters over that overcast skin-penetrating overcast oceanic bullshit. That is before we even get to the tunderstorms and the summers...
|
|
|
Post by Donar on Jan 6, 2018 5:30:03 GMT -5
Omaha, no discussion.
|
|
|
Post by Ariete on Jan 6, 2018 11:12:06 GMT -5
Pot-limit Omaha.
|
|
|
Post by ilmc90 on Jan 6, 2018 18:13:37 GMT -5
Metz for the cooler summers and lower sunshine hours.
|
|
|
Post by deneb78 on Jan 9, 2018 14:31:29 GMT -5
Metz for being more oceanic and lower seasonal range.
|
|