|
Post by alex992 on Sept 26, 2018 12:33:57 GMT -5
To, or below. To, or below. To, or below. To (0.0 C) or below (-0.01 C or less) Jesus, it's not a hard concept to grasp. I don't understand why you're nitpitcking so much just so your climate can average like 190 freezes a year instead of 195.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 26, 2018 13:28:13 GMT -5
Panic at the SMHI offices, as they debate whether or not the 29th will be classified as a freeze.
|
|
|
Post by Ariete on Sept 26, 2018 13:29:39 GMT -5
Jumalauta. -7C is some severe shit.
|
|
|
Post by AJ1013 on Sept 26, 2018 13:29:41 GMT -5
Panic at the SMHI offices, as they debate whether or not the 29th will be classified as a freeze. It will not. The mean is 0.5C which means that a freeze did not occur.
|
|
|
Post by Babu on Sept 26, 2018 14:17:18 GMT -5
To, or below. To, or below. To, or below. To (0.0 C) or below (-0.01 C or less) Jesus, it's not a hard concept to grasp. I don't understand why you're nitpitcking so much just so your climate can average like 190 freezes a year instead of 195. The point of this thread was just to find out which was more used so I'd know which to use myself. Smhi defines a frost as temps below 0'C, and that's technically the definition of freezing temps too. The only reason I got defensive is because a lot of you guys seemed to think that it's to not regard 0.0'C as a freeze. Because it really isn't.
|
|
|
Post by alex992 on Sept 26, 2018 14:24:09 GMT -5
It really is , because 0.0 C is literally freezing point. That's like asking if 100.0 C counts as boiling point.
|
|
|
Post by Ariete on Sept 26, 2018 14:57:55 GMT -5
That's like asking if 100.0 C counts as boiling point.
Jajajaja bro the boiling point is like 99.97C and maybe depending on the pressure or shit like that.
The freezing point of salt water is around -2 to -4, so Gothenburg will not see as much ice as Turku.
|
|
|
Post by Babu on Sept 26, 2018 16:05:25 GMT -5
It really is , because 0.0 C is literally freezing point. That's like asking if 100.0 C counts as boiling point. You're simply wrong there. As Urania said, 0.0 isn't the temperature at which water freezes. 0.0 is the point below which water will freeze, and above which ice will melt. If the temperature is below 0.0'C, water will start freezing. If the temperature is above 0.0'C the ice will start melting. At exactly 0.0'C it will stay unchanged (or do some freaky equilibrium stuff that I don't know about). Since 0.0 can be -0.49 to 0.49, it can either be freezing or non-freezing. Like schrödinger's cat, a 0.0'C reading is in a superposition of being both below freezing and above freezing. Saying one or the other is makes no sense since both are equally likely.
|
|
|
Post by AJ1013 on Sept 26, 2018 16:10:46 GMT -5
It really is , because 0.0 C is literally freezing point. That's like asking if 100.0 C counts as boiling point. You're simply wrong there. As Urania said, 0.0 isn't the temperature at which water freezes. 0.0 is the point below which water will freeze, and above which ice will melt. If the temperature is below 0.0'C, water will start freezing. If the temperature is above 0.0'C the ice will start melting. At exactly 0.0'C it will stay unchanged (or do some freaky equilibrium stuff that I don't know about). Since 0.0 can be -0.49 to 0.49, it can either be freezing or non-freezing. Like schrödinger's cat, a 0.0'C reading is in a superposition of being both below freezing and above freezing. Saying one or the other is makes no sense since both are equally likely. You just reminded me of supercooled water which, if you haven’t seen it, is incredibly cool. If you put a bottle of water into a freezer just below the freezing point (like -1C) it won’t freeze until you disturb the water (by tapping it) at which point the whole mass of water will instantly turn into dense icy slush.
|
|
|
Post by alex992 on Sept 26, 2018 17:16:39 GMT -5
It really is , because 0.0 C is literally freezing point. That's like asking if 100.0 C counts as boiling point. You're simply wrong there. As Urania said, 0.0 isn't the temperature at which water freezes. 0.0 is the point below which water will freeze, and above which ice will melt. If the temperature is below 0.0'C, water will start freezing. If the temperature is above 0.0'C the ice will start melting. At exactly 0.0'C it will stay unchanged (or do some freaky equilibrium stuff that I don't know about). Since 0.0 can be -0.49 to 0.49, it can either be freezing or non-freezing. Like schrödinger's cat, a 0.0'C reading is in a superposition of being both below freezing and above freezing. Saying one or the other is makes no sense since both are equally likely. What's funny is you keep scratching and clawing about if water freezes at 0.0 C or not, but that wasn't even your original question. Your question is if 0.0 C is considered a freeze or air frost or not. Which the simple answer is yes. End of discussion. Your silly pickiness and pedantic behavior on this topic is weird.
|
|
|
Post by jgtheone on Sept 27, 2018 0:50:21 GMT -5
If water is stored at exactly 0.0000000000000C, it just kills itself because it doesn't know what to do.
Also, if that -7C eventuates, it could be a new record low for September.
|
|
|
Post by Babu on Sept 27, 2018 2:10:02 GMT -5
You're simply wrong there. As Urania said, 0.0 isn't the temperature at which water freezes. 0.0 is the point below which water will freeze, and above which ice will melt. If the temperature is below 0.0'C, water will start freezing. If the temperature is above 0.0'C the ice will start melting. At exactly 0.0'C it will stay unchanged (or do some freaky equilibrium stuff that I don't know about). Since 0.0 can be -0.49 to 0.49, it can either be freezing or non-freezing. Like schrödinger's cat, a 0.0'C reading is in a superposition of being both below freezing and above freezing. Saying one or the other is makes no sense since both are equally likely. What's funny is you keep scratching and clawing about if water freezes at 0.0 C or not, but that wasn't even your original question. Your question is if 0.0 C is considered a freeze or air frost or not. Which the simple answer is yes. End of discussion. Your silly pickiness and pedantic behavior on this topic is weird. The reason is you're calling me a because I "don't understand what freezing point" means when evidently the problem was you didn't whereas I did.
|
|
|
Post by Hiromant on Sept 27, 2018 2:14:48 GMT -5
Water stays at exactly 0°C while it's freezing and the crystal structures of ice are formed so it's a definite yes.
|
|
|
Post by Babu on Sept 27, 2018 3:18:02 GMT -5
Water stays at exactly 0°C while it's freezing and the crystal structures of ice are formed so it's a definite yes. It stays at 0 while melting too but I see your point
|
|
|
Post by urania93 on Sept 27, 2018 9:09:03 GMT -5
You're simply wrong there. As Urania said, 0.0 isn't the temperature at which water freezes. 0.0 is the point below which water will freeze, and above which ice will melt. If the temperature is below 0.0'C, water will start freezing. If the temperature is above 0.0'C the ice will start melting. At exactly 0.0'C it will stay unchanged (or do some freaky equilibrium stuff that I don't know about). Since 0.0 can be -0.49 to 0.49, it can either be freezing or non-freezing. Like schrödinger's cat, a 0.0'C reading is in a superposition of being both below freezing and above freezing. Saying one or the other is makes no sense since both are equally likely. Don't name the schrödinger's cat for this, it is just all another subject. So that this thread is starting to deviate toward a really weird direction, I think that we need to define with a little bit more of precision what the freezing point of water actually is. First of all, the phase transitions of pure water follow this graph: This graph is the phases diagram of water, and represents as a function of temperature and pressure which phase (solid, liquid or gas) is the most stable from a thermodynamic point of view. The lines between the areas of stability of different phases correspond to the equilibrium conditions between the two phases on the two sides of the line, while point B is called "triple point" and is the point in which the three phases are in equilibrium conditions. If you like the genre, the extended diagram gets quite interesting in the solid part [1]What does equilibrium conditions mean? It means that the two possible phases (for example, liquid and solid) are equally stable at those conditions of temperature and pressure. It is a dynamic equilibrium condition, which means that the amount of molecules (or other) which pass from phase 1 to phase 2 is the same as the one of molecules that pass from phase 2 to phase 1, so the relative amounts of the two phases don't change over time. This is very different from a "schrödinger's cat"-like situation, in which you would not be able to tell which the phase is (or, at least, not before opening the cat's box). If you look at the standard freezing point of water in that graph you will see that it is a quite random point along the equilibrium line between solid and liquid phase (at the crossing between a pressure of 1 atm and a temperature of 0°C). If you changed the pressure, also the temperature of the phase transition would be a little different. And the situation becomes even more complicated in a stystem which is not only made by pure water. Also, this graph is only about thermodynamic equilibrium, and it doesn't take into account other particulars like the nucleation of the first solid crystals, amorphous phases and so on. Now, this thread is about the temperature required to have an air frost. In this situation the diagram above can't be applied, because we are evidently don't talking about a pure water system. You can't even say that all the water present in the air suddently falls down as ice when the thermometer reaches 0°C, actually there isn't any sudden change in the air mixture at that temperature which could make you choose a specific temperature for a real physical reason. What the weather agiencies did was to choose a totally arbitrary (but reasonable) value as a threshold for defining the conditions for having an air frost, and they decided to use the temperature of the freezing point of water for a pressure of 1 atm. They could also have chosen any other random value, their porpoise is only to define a parameter with which you can evaluate the number of air frosts and that you can use for comparing different data series.
|
|
|
Post by rpvan on Jun 30, 2022 18:47:50 GMT -5
That's a freeze, though frost will undoubtably form and be visible at that temperature unless it's very dry (extremely low dewpoints).
With regards to frost... seen it plenty of time on the grass and/or rooftops in the morning even with a low as high as 3c.
|
|
|
Post by greysrigging on Jun 30, 2022 19:00:36 GMT -5
The official temps are measured in a Stevenson Screen sited 1200mm ( 4') above the grass level. Grass level can be substantially colder than at Screen height. For example, a preliminary frost warning is issued in Alice Springs with a forecast min of 5c and a moderate frost risk at 2.2c. Many AWS sites in AU have instruments that record grass temps as well as Screen temps.
|
|
|
Post by Benfxmth on Jun 30, 2022 19:03:41 GMT -5
Yeah, 0°C could be anything between -0.049°C to 0.049°C.
Lol @ Babu_Wethuuuuu's nitpicking in this thread
|
|