|
|
Post by Ariete on Dec 9, 2017 10:21:06 GMT -5
What do you think? I would say Infoclimat.fr. Its day-to-day recordings might be ok, but everything else is broken and unreliable. Don't use it as any kind of source, please.
|
|
|
|
Post by knot on Dec 9, 2017 11:16:57 GMT -5
LKJ1988's calender. No contest.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 9, 2017 11:32:07 GMT -5
accuweather is a joke. infoclimat is fairly accurate alltough they calculate the mean as (max+min)/2
|
|
|
|
Post by shalop on Dec 9, 2017 11:33:01 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by flamingGalah on Dec 9, 2017 11:35:55 GMT -5
LKJ1988's calendars are more accurate than infoclimat.fr
|
|
|
|
Post by Lommaren on Dec 9, 2017 11:36:02 GMT -5
Not too familiar with most, but LKJ's calendar surely is a good bet?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 9, 2017 12:01:03 GMT -5
Accuweather, weatherbase are by far the worst.
Weather.com, wunderground and LKJ1988's calendar are comparable.
The best are weatheronline, meteociel, ogimet.
|
|
|
|
Post by Steelernation on Dec 9, 2017 12:56:04 GMT -5
Weatherbase, accuweather, LKJ.
Infoclimate isn’t very accurate, but an upgrade on the others.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 9, 2017 12:57:06 GMT -5
Best for my location:
Metoffice/BBC,
Worst:
Accuweather, Wunderground, Weatheronline
|
|
|
|
Post by Ariete on Dec 9, 2017 13:53:28 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Nidaros on Dec 9, 2017 14:10:16 GMT -5
Records are crap, precip data is often crap, but the temp averages are not that far off at infoclimat. Although they are often based on fewer years than stated. I trust WO much more. But the real data for Norway is of course at eklima - the source. Not bad that access is free to the climate database used by met.no. So when I have time, I always use eklima for my country. Like for the monthly summaries etc. |
|
|
|
Post by Babu on Dec 9, 2017 15:29:27 GMT -5
What do you think? I would say Infoclimat.fr. Its day-to-day recordings might be ok, but everything else is broken and unreliable. Don't use it as any kind of source, please. Look. It's pretttttty easy to disregard 40'c records in January, but the average temperatures are generally within one or two decimals when the timeline isn't completely broken. It's much more accurate than weatheronline. Weatheronline has fewer stations with fewer years of data. And for Umeå, weatheronline is off by like 5 decimals in lots of months whereas infoclimat is just a decimal off here and there. If tha data timeline looks mostly unbroken, then you can be quite sure it will be pretty accurate. If it's missing years (which is sooo blatantly overt when it is), then obviously you can take it with a little grain of salt. |
|
|
|
Post by Ariete on Dec 9, 2017 15:47:40 GMT -5
What do you think? I would say Infoclimat.fr. Its day-to-day recordings might be ok, but everything else is broken and unreliable. Don't use it as any kind of source, please. Look. It's pretttttty easy to disregard 40'c records in January, but the average temperatures are generally within one or two decimals when the timeline isn't completely broken. It's much more accurate than weatheronline. Weatheronline has fewer stations with fewer years of data. And for Umeå, weatheronline is off by like 5 decimals in lots of months whereas infoclimat is just a decimal off here and there. If tha data timeline looks mostly unbroken, then you can be quite sure it will be pretty accurate. If it's missing years (which is sooo blatantly overt when it is), then obviously you can take it with a little grain of salt. It's completely broken! Använd ogimet.com, copy-paste datan i excel eller openoffice så får du 99% säkra data. Skit i de där inflopclimatjävlet! |
|
|
|
Post by Cadeau on Dec 9, 2017 15:47:54 GMT -5
Infoclimat seems working well with own French cities but lacks to get reliable historical data.
|
|
|
|
Post by Babu on Dec 9, 2017 15:59:21 GMT -5
Look. It's pretttttty easy to disregard 40'c records in January, but the average temperatures are generally within one or two decimals when the timeline isn't completely broken. It's much more accurate than weatheronline. Weatheronline has fewer stations with fewer years of data. And for Umeå, weatheronline is off by like 5 decimals in lots of months whereas infoclimat is just a decimal off here and there. If tha data timeline looks mostly unbroken, then you can be quite sure it will be pretty accurate. If it's missing years (which is sooo blatantly overt when it is), then obviously you can take it with a little grain of salt. It's completely broken! Använd ogimet.com, copy-paste datan i excel eller openoffice så får du 99% säkra data. Skit i de där inflopclimatjävlet! It really isn't broken. You're the broken one. It's way better than weatheronline. If you can't use it because records aren't reliable then you must have eaten some kind if ass burger at that Sheriff's Car |
|
|
|
Post by Ariete on Dec 9, 2017 16:08:05 GMT -5
It really isn't broken. You're the broken one. It's way better than weatheronline. If you can't use it because records aren't reliable then you must have eaten some kind if ass burger at that Sheriff's Car Varför kan du int använda ogimet som får all data direkt från SMHI? |
|
|
|
Post by alex992 on Dec 9, 2017 16:11:32 GMT -5
Everblyat's twat?
|
|
|
|
Post by Babu on Dec 9, 2017 16:14:51 GMT -5
It really isn't broken. You're the broken one. It's way better than weatheronline. If you can't use it because records aren't reliable then you must have eaten some kind if ass burger at that Sheriff's Car Varför kan du int använda ogimet som får all data direkt från SMHI? Därför att det tar ännu längre tid än att bara skaffa datan från SMHI. Och det går ju inte heller att enbart kopiera temperaturkolumnerna. Så ogimet är värdelöst för mig när det gäller genomsnitt. Använder det fortfarande för dag-för-dag-värden däremot. |
|
|
|
Post by Ariete on Dec 9, 2017 16:35:26 GMT -5
Därför att det tar ännu längre tid än att bara skaffa datan från SMHI. Och det går ju inte heller att enbart kopiera temperaturkolumnerna. Så ogimet är värdelöst för mig när det gäller genomsnitt. Använder det fortfarande för dag-för-dag-värden däremot. Nå men för helvete. Använd den där apple-tangenten som motsvarar CTRL på windows-maskiner, dra o copy-paste månadens Tmax o Tmin och paste dem i Apache, OpenOffice eller va i helsike. Sen gör du de samma me regn kolumnen. De e int mera svårt en de, tar två sekunder. PERKELE!  Gillar du kramar?  |
|
|
|
Post by Babu on Dec 9, 2017 16:41:14 GMT -5
Därför att det tar ännu längre tid än att bara skaffa datan från SMHI. Och det går ju inte heller att enbart kopiera temperaturkolumnerna. Så ogimet är värdelöst för mig när det gäller genomsnitt. Använder det fortfarande för dag-för-dag-värden däremot. Nå men för helvete. Använd den där apple-tangenten som motsvarar CTRL på windows-maskiner, dra o copy-paste månadens Tmax o Tmin och paste dem i Apache, OpenOffice eller va i helsike. Sen gör du de samma me regn kolumnen. De e int mera svårt en de, tar två sekunder. PERKELE! Gillar du kramar? Grejen är att man inte kan markera kolumner allting skulle behöva markeras. |
|
Lived:
Residence:
