|
Post by Nidaros on Oct 6, 2019 7:10:29 GMT -5
Another few images from the Arctic from me and by me, around 250 km north of the Arctic Circle. Arctic due to location not due to climate. Mobile phone images so not great quality. This was the look October 1th up there.
landscape not obviously different from the area by Trondheim True.
But a closer inspection would reveal that this area, unlike Trondheim, has no grain fields nearby, except perhaps some small ones used for animal fodder. Also many tree species, like the maple trees so common in and around Trondheim, are lacking, or are rare and growing only in a few gardens. And certainly no chestnut, ash or oak. Also lots of other plant species are lacking up there. Sometimes that is good, such as the lack of Common wormwood (Artemisia vulgaris) which those with pollen allergies hates.
|
|
|
Post by Babu on Oct 6, 2019 7:24:15 GMT -5
Went back to the arboretum yesterday. Wanted to compare the foliage with when I was there on the 26th of September Noticeably fewer leaves and less green than two weeks ago in this forest near me Much more colors than last time, but some trees are almost completely bare Sat myself by the river to have a breakfast Pretty breakfast view I'm not gonna make much comments this album. You can't really tell from this image, but that birch to the left is the girthiest birch I've ever seen. My armspan would just about cross half of the birch. Nice graveyard Nice peak foliage Arriving at the rapids and arboretum I'd say this is just about peak foliage Personally I prefer the pre-peak two weeks ago. Not as many colors, but more leaves, and I like green too. This particular view is a bit post peak it seems Much much much less water in the rapids this time. Don't know why. Like 60% of an average October's rain fell in the first couple of days of this month. Maybe some dam up the river idk. In the arboretum part Someone forgot to put out their fire after they left I like this photo This one too Most of the green trees in the natural landscape won't see any colors. Smoke from the fire. I think some (other?) people came and started using the fire though. It was very cold. About 7'C. I wish I'd brought a fleece or a warmer jacket. I also wished I owned a pair of mittens. Headed back home around 4pm Most maples exposed to sunlight have nice colors right now While I took this shot, my best friend's dad popped into frame. He was on a walk with a friend and I randomly encountered him. The perspective of the image makes the trees in the middle look 200m tall, or, alternatively, my friend's dad looks small enough for me to pick up with one hand. More photos of this part because it looks pretty Nice maples Nice colors on the street where I live
|
|
|
Post by Nidaros on Oct 6, 2019 7:28:02 GMT -5
Following up with a few images by me from Bergen, taken Oct 2th. Late afternoon (after a long work day), again using mobile phone.
Ulriken mountain is very close to the city center. The main reason why the old sunshine data for Bergen is pretty useless as a measure of cloudiness.
Town square
Lille Lungegårdsvannet, a llittle lake in the center
|
|
|
Post by Babu on Oct 6, 2019 7:33:42 GMT -5
Bergen seems to be afflicted with the same problem as continental Europe where lots of trees just drop their leaves or turn brown instead of getting fall colors
|
|
|
Post by nei on Oct 6, 2019 10:24:33 GMT -5
Went back to the arboretum yesterday. Wanted to compare the foliage with when I was there on the 26th of September Noticeably fewer leaves and less green than two weeks ago in this forest near me nice colors, looks like you have more reds and bright oranges than Norway; different tree species?
|
|
|
Post by Nidaros on Oct 6, 2019 10:29:05 GMT -5
Is that natural colors Baba, or adjusted?
Here are some images i took in Trondheim Oct 5th, yesterday.
Up in the city hills at 300 m ASL, it look like this:
|
|
|
Post by Babu on Oct 6, 2019 11:08:25 GMT -5
Went back to the arboretum yesterday. Wanted to compare the foliage with when I was there on the 26th of September Noticeably fewer leaves and less green than two weeks ago in this forest near me nice colors, looks like you have more reds and bright oranges than Norway; different tree species? The arboretum obviously has a lot of non-native species that have better colors than our typical trees. Also the tree composition along the Umeå river is a bit different than the rest of Northern Sweden because the river has brought with it finer soil compared to the otherwise pretty sandy soil in the rest of the taiga belt. Is that natural colors Baba or adjusted? I did increase the saturation in most images, but I didn't edit specific colors or anything like that. But I mean, it's not like an unedited image represents what your eye sees.
|
|
|
Post by Morningrise on Oct 6, 2019 11:29:49 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by rozenn on Oct 6, 2019 12:16:38 GMT -5
I did increase the saturation in most images, but I didn't edit specific colors or anything like that. But I mean, it's not like an unedited image represents what your eye sees. Definitely. What comes out of the camera unedited always looks dull compared to what you see IRL. Not much color to show yet, so I'm just gonna post different skies over different places. Partly cloudy skies over Lyon on Wednesday: Clear skies over Bordeaux the day after: Overcast over Bordeaux the day after: Bare tree next to a green one in Paris yesterday:
|
|
|
Post by Babu on Oct 6, 2019 12:30:09 GMT -5
Morningrise Surprisingly many trees that have lost leaves without getting any colors. I associate Canada with very vivid fall foliage Also, thank you rozenn Yeah, here's an unprocessed raw file to give perspective on the matter: That's obviously much duller than a sunny day should look. Especially when you take RAW photos, you have to edit the photos. I obviously tried to make my photos look good when I edited them, but I tried to keep it looking natural and I didn't edit it, like making yellows appear more orange and so on, which you could do. One thing to remember as well, is that a RAW photo isn't actually a photo per se. All it is is a bunch of data that a program will then interpret. If you open a RAW photo in different programs, they'll look different because those different programs choose to interpret the data differently. And after a few second's of editing here's what it looks like: My edit:
|
|
|
Post by nei on Oct 6, 2019 13:37:26 GMT -5
Morningrise Surprisingly many trees that have lost leaves without getting any colors. I associate Canada with very vivid fall foliage Morningrise is in Saskatoon in the Prairies; drier than further east. Better foliage would be in Quebec, most of southern Ontario and Atlantic Canada (not including Newfoundland)
|
|
|
Post by Babu on Oct 6, 2019 13:42:32 GMT -5
Morningrise Surprisingly many trees that have lost leaves without getting any colors. I associate Canada with very vivid fall foliage Morningrise is in Saskatoon in the Prairies; drier than further east. Better foliage would be in Quebec, most of southern Ontario and Atlantic Canada (not including Newfoundland) Dry and sunny are good for foliage though. I know the best foliage is in the east, but I always thought the reason was just the west having more conifer trees and fewer large broadleafs.
|
|
|
Post by nei on Oct 6, 2019 14:06:43 GMT -5
Morningrise is in Saskatoon in the Prairies; drier than further east. Better foliage would be in Quebec, most of southern Ontario and Atlantic Canada (not including Newfoundland) Dry and sunny are good for foliage though. I know the best foliage is in the east, but I always thought the reason was just the west having more conifer trees and fewer large broadleafs. Dry and sunny is good for foliage during foliage season but they should have had ample rain before; a longer term drought (a drought for us would be more than prairies level of rain) is bad for foliage. Also, above average sunshine but with heavy rain for a few days should be fine.
|
|
|
Post by Morningrise on Oct 6, 2019 16:15:28 GMT -5
Coastal BC also has very vibrant fall colors, as good or better than the ones I've seen in Ontario and Quebec at this time of the year. The prairies unfortunately have fairly dull and short-lived colors compared to most other inhabited regions of Canada, not sure if it's because of climate or the particular types of trees we have, or what. As noted, we have a very dry climate out here compared to those other areas, so that might have a role to play.
|
|
|
Post by 🖕🏿Mörön🖕🏿 on Oct 6, 2019 19:01:07 GMT -5
Another few images from the Arctic from me and by me, around 250 km north of the Arctic Circle. Arctic due to location not due to climate. Mobile phone images so not great quality. This was the look October 1th up there.
Beautiful, where are these?
|
|
|
Post by Moron on Oct 7, 2019 9:22:03 GMT -5
A change from the autumn colours...Photos from Kalgoorlie Field Trip September 28th-October 5th 2019. Location: Mount Hunt, 15km South of Kalgoorlie. A 1.3km by 1.8km area which we mapped over the course of 5 days (and 1 intro day that covered some small areas). Section 1: Nerdy Geology Section 15-20CM LONG MG-OLIVINE SPINIFEX BOOKS WTF Bombs in Felsic Volcaniclastics Outcrop of Microcrystalline Siliceous Metasediment (Chert for the non-geologists) Section 2: Normal photos for the whole family The Bush: Sunset of day 3 The Super Pit (deepest open cut mine in the Southern Hemisphere going down to 600m) Unstable weather and very cool clouds on the final day! Got some thunder and short heavy showers too, some people nearby even got to see lightning. Me being a mong (cropped to remove a friend):
|
|
|
Post by Nidaros on Oct 7, 2019 11:00:06 GMT -5
Another few images from the Arctic from me and by me, around 250 km north of the Arctic Circle. Arctic due to location not due to climate. Mobile phone images so not great quality. This was the look October 1th up there.
Beautiful, where are these? In and near Narvik
|
|
|
Post by 🖕🏿Mörön🖕🏿 on Oct 7, 2019 22:16:34 GMT -5
A change from the autumn colours...Photos from Kalgoorlie Field Trip September 28th-October 5th 2019. Location: Mount Hunt, 15km South of Kalgoorlie. A 1.3km by 1.8km area which we mapped over the course of 5 days (and 1 intro day that covered some small areas). Section 1: Nerdy Geology Section 15-20CM LONG MG-OLIVINE SPINIFEX BOOKS WTF Any idea on the age of the spinifex? That's pretty awesome. Fuck, I wish Antarctica would melt so we could explore its geology as well. Just imagine what hidden treasures lay beneath all that ice. Also, you look like a total geologist. I have one of those hats as well. It was a lifesaver in the field though!
|
|
|
Post by Moron on Oct 8, 2019 0:14:58 GMT -5
Well the Basalts that the Spinifex are located in are around 2.4Ba/2400Ma. Also it's most likely in a transitional zone between Basalt and Komatiite to the east of the mapping area (these spinifex books were located on the very edge of the mapping area). Like still compositionally a Basalt but a very high-Mg variant of it.
|
|
|
Post by 🖕🏿Mörön🖕🏿 on Oct 8, 2019 1:32:39 GMT -5
Sunset today. Pretty typical for October.
|
|